Posts: 530
Threads: 26
Joined: Feb 2015
Reputation:
0
I personally don't worry about this after using Linux for the last few years. When I first started however it was something I did worry about. I think it would probably be a good option to be able to be added from Lite Software to ease the minds of new users.
“I have not failed. I’ve just found 10,000 ways that won’t work.” - Thomas Edison
Posts: 227
Threads: 33
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
0
I voted "no" because 1) most malicious code is written for Windows (not that Linux can't be zapped but less likely) and 2) unless there's only 1 AV prog available, I'd like to be able to choose which one I want.
Posts: 508
Threads: 55
Joined: Jan 2015
Have never used anti-virus in Linux in five years.
Assuming it would be in lite software then the user has the choice whether to install or not.
Dont see a problem.
Jocklad
Posts: 8,898
Threads: 542
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation:
5
Good idea avj, I've added a new Poll option.
Posts: 227
Threads: 33
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
0
Since the 3rd option was added after I voted, can my vote be changed to that, please? While I still don't think AV is needed, it would be nice to have it available.
Posts: 1,484
Threads: 96
Joined: Mar 2014
Reputation:
0
Like @avj
I think for peace of mind having it available via Lite Software would be good.
If you are in a complete Linux setup, your risk is low,
But if you are still in a mixed/dual boot Linux/Windows set-up,
you may inadvertently copy something from Linux to Windows,
if you have a shared/common data/file area.
Upgrades WIP 2.6 to 2.8 - (6 X 2.6 to 2.8 completed on: 20/02/16 All O.K )
Linux Lite 3.0 Humming on a ASRock N3070 Mobo ~ btrfs RAID 10 Install on 4 Disks
Computers Early days:
ZX Spectrum(1982) , HP-150 MS-DOS(1983) , Amstrad CPC464(1984) , BBC Micro B+64(1985) , My First PC HP-Vectra(1987)
Posts: 62
Threads: 3
Joined: Oct 2015
Reputation:
0
Made available through Lite Software would be good. It makes it easily accessible for those that want it then.