LINUX LITE 7.2 FINAL RELEASED - SEE RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS SECTION FOR DETAILS


Poll: Should Linux Lite 3.x series have an Anti Virus bundled?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes
13.16%
5 13.16%
No
2.63%
1 2.63%
Add it to Lite Software
63.16%
24 63.16%
Instructions via Documentation
21.05%
8 21.05%
Total 38 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Anti Virus Poll
#1
Should Linux Lite 3.x series have an Anti Virus bundled?

I ask this because this OS aims to meet the expectations of Windows users. You're welcome to have your say.

Thank you for participating Smile

Jerry
Reply
#2
I personally don't worry about this after using Linux for the last few years. When I first started however it was something I did worry about. I think it would probably be a good option to be able to be added from Lite Software to ease the minds of new users.
“I have not failed. I’ve just found 10,000 ways that won’t work.” - Thomas Edison
Reply
#3
I voted "no" because 1) most malicious code is written for Windows (not that Linux can't be zapped but less likely) and 2) unless there's only 1 AV prog available, I'd like to be able to choose which one I want.
Reply
#4
Have never used anti-virus in Linux in five years.

Assuming it would be in lite software then the user has the choice whether to install or not.

Dont see a problem.

Jocklad

Reply
#5
Good idea avj, I've added a new Poll option.
Reply
#6
I wouldn't use it. Might make new users from Windows nervous if installed by default. Having in Lite Software would be good for paranoid coming from Windows.  Wink
[Image: EtYqOrS.png%5D]

Left Mac OS X for Linux in Jan 2014
Reply
#7
The main question is whether running an AV software is (meanwhile) recommended for an average Linux Lite user. Not whether someone coming from Windows expects this software.
IF it's not necessary - I still don't use one - I would rather educate the people who worry than install software that continuously eats up system resources.

Therefore:
1. inform/ educate - if appropriate even on the getting started screen
2. offer an AV software via Lite Software

My 2c Smile
Reply
#8
Since the 3rd option was added after I voted, can my vote be changed to that, please?  While I still don't think AV is needed, it would be nice to have it available.
Reply
#9
Like @avj
I think for peace of mind having it available via Lite Software would be good.

If you are in a complete Linux setup, your risk is low,
But if you are still in a mixed/dual boot Linux/Windows set-up,
you may inadvertently copy something from Linux to Windows,
if you have a shared/common data/file area.
Upgrades WIP 2.6 to 2.8 - (6 X 2.6 to 2.8 completed on: 20/02/16 All O.K )
Linux Lite 3.0 Humming on a ASRock N3070 Mobo ~ btrfs RAID 10 Install on 4 Disks Smile

Computers Early days:
ZX Spectrum(1982) , HP-150 MS-DOS(1983) , Amstrad CPC464(1984) ,  BBC Micro B+64(1985) , My First PC HP-Vectra(1987)
Reply
#10
Made available through Lite Software would be good. It makes it easily accessible for those that want it then.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)