LINUX LITE 7.2 FINAL RELEASED - SEE RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS SECTION FOR DETAILS


Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Mixed language in menu's and applications.
#11
Just installed Dutch, and got this, didn't do anything special....

[Image: woypmNB.png]
Reply
#12
i was refering to the explanations (beschrijving) in synaptic some of them in there are in english, others are in dutch. See attached screenshot below. Click the screenshot for a larger version


  [Image: sSbdtSDl.png]



Life on earth is expensive but it does include a free trip around the sun.
Reply
#13
It is probably correct that the repositories are a problem. The support in Debian stable is complete for basic desktop. You may have to find the correct versions for certain packages in linux lite, however, and you may have to force those versions with synaptic to install them. Libreoffice is probably a case like that. Ubuntu repository versions can be tricky and depending where you look appear to be correct when they are not correct for Unbuntu based distros, only for the Unbuntu distro itself. Updated or higher numbered packages may not be the correct ones. I use lots of older dated Debian applications in linux lite, sometimes forcing versions in synaptic. Still some packages themselves may not have Dutch support. Good luck. Ubuntu is not Debian itself, though Debian based. Simply put, Ubuntu is modified Debian, and Linux Lite is modified Ubuntu.
Trinidad 
All opinions expressed and all advice given by Trinidad Cruz on this forum are his responsibility alone and do not necessarily reflect the views or methods of the developers of Linux Lite. He is a citizen of the United States where it is acceptable to occasionally be uninformed and inept as long as you pay your taxes.
Reply
#14
I maybe misunderstanding.?

If a program is written in a certain language, say English and nobody translates it into any other languages, it's description will remain in English.?
If it gets translated into other languages, say French, German and Dutch, if your locale is one of those, it will show it correctly for one of those, if not it will be shown in English
Is that why some are English, No translation done, and some Dutch translations have been done.?

Upgrades WIP 2.6 to 2.8 - (6 X 2.6 to 2.8 completed on: 20/02/16 All O.K )
Linux Lite 3.0 Humming on a ASRock N3070 Mobo ~ btrfs RAID 10 Install on 4 Disks Smile

Computers Early days:
ZX Spectrum(1982) , HP-150 MS-DOS(1983) , Amstrad CPC464(1984) ,  BBC Micro B+64(1985) , My First PC HP-Vectra(1987)
Reply
#15
(06-09-2016, 03:11 PM)Wirezfree link Wrote: I maybe misunderstanding.?

If a program is written in a certain language, say English and nobody translates it into any other languages, it's description will remain in English.?
If it gets translated into other languages, say French, German and Dutch, if your locale is one of those, it will show it correctly for one of those, if not it will be shown in English
Is that why some are English, No translation done, and some Dutch translations have been done.?
Maybe for some programs. But in my example, Synaptic IS fully translated into my native language. But still i get a mixture of English and Dutch in the menu bar/buttons of Synaptic. I set my native language as a system-wide language, removed all English language packages but still a mixture between English and Dutch. Also i stated, that this is NOT an issue with other *buntu-based distro's like Xubuntu and Linux Mint. So my best guess herfe is that some required language packages cannot be found in the repository list used by LL (missing repo's?).
My laptop:
MSI GE70-2PE*Quad core Intel Core i7-4710HQ*Kingston 16 GB RAM*Intel 4th Gen. Integr. GPU/NVidia GeForce GTX860M*Qualcomm Atheros Killer E2200/Intel Wireless 3160

I don't need Google, my wife knows everything!

My Linux website
Reply
#16
We are indeed missing repos nomko. Backup your sources.list first, then use these entries:

Code:
# deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial main restricted

# deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial-updates main restricted
# deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted

# See http://help.ubuntu.com/community/UpgradeNotes for how to upgrade to
# newer versions of the distribution.
deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial main restricted
deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial main restricted

## Major bug fix updates produced after the final release of the
## distribution.
deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial-updates main restricted
deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial-updates main restricted

## N.B. software from this repository is ENTIRELY UNSUPPORTED by the Ubuntu
## team. Also, please note that software in universe WILL NOT receive any
## review or updates from the Ubuntu security team.
deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial universe
deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial universe
deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial-updates universe
deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial-updates universe

## N.B. software from this repository is ENTIRELY UNSUPPORTED by the Ubuntu
## team, and may not be under a free licence. Please satisfy yourself as to
## your rights to use the software. Also, please note that software in
## multiverse WILL NOT receive any review or updates from the Ubuntu
## security team.
deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial multiverse
deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial multiverse
deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial-updates multiverse
deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial-updates multiverse

## N.B. software from this repository may not have been tested as
## extensively as that contained in the main release, although it includes
## newer versions of some applications which may provide useful features.
## Also, please note that software in backports WILL NOT receive any review
## or updates from the Ubuntu security team.
deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial-backports main restricted universe multiverse
deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial-backports main restricted universe multiverse

deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted
deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted
deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security universe
deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security universe
deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security multiverse
deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security multiverse

## Uncomment the following two lines to add software from Canonical's
## 'partner' repository.
## This software is not part of Ubuntu, but is offered by Canonical and the
## respective vendors as a service to Ubuntu users.
# deb http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu xenial partner
# deb-src http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu xenial partner

## Uncomment the following two lines to add software from Ubuntu's
## 'extras' repository.
## This software is not part of Ubuntu, but is offered by third-party
## developers who want to ship their latest software.
# deb http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main
# deb-src http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main
deb http://archive.canonical.com/ xenial partner
# deb-src http://archive.canonical.com/ xenial partner

replacing 'us' with your Country Code. I'll fix this in 3.2 You may use network connection after this update, just reboot and it will return.
Reply
#17
I'll add this page to this discussion (https://www.debian.org/security/) only because repositories can be confusing for new windows converts, and other packages in cutting edge OS Ubuntu can easily ruin a Linux Lite installation if installed from the terminal. Adding repos to synaptic in future releases of your wonderful distro is a can of worms for ordinary windows users. So called "security" updates, which are really just system hardening changes must preferably be available from an in house mirror and be distro specific if you intend to use an automatic updater in the future. Microsoft provided its ordinary users with no choices, other than to refuse downloaded updates. Automatically providing too many choices could become a problem to new windows converts defeating the purpose of your clean light easily understood trusty based distro. Leaving certain repos out of synaptic is not harmful. Questions can be answered and repos added afterwards from a point of correct understanding and praxis. I like this distro so much, I consider it almost a public service.
Trinidad                 
All opinions expressed and all advice given by Trinidad Cruz on this forum are his responsibility alone and do not necessarily reflect the views or methods of the developers of Linux Lite. He is a citizen of the United States where it is acceptable to occasionally be uninformed and inept as long as you pay your taxes.
Reply
#18
@Trinidad, we have always carried that range of repositories. The 2.x series experienced no problems, in fact, it enhanced software. I do appreciate and understand your points though. Cheers Smile
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)