LINUX LITE 7.2 FINAL RELEASED - SEE RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS SECTION FOR DETAILS


Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
LL 2.8 or 3.0 -which is better suited for HP 23-h009?
#1
Is LL 2.8 or  (3.0 to come) is better suited to ? Of the 38 results from the LL Hdware dbase, this system was not listed there. (yet?)

HP Pavilion, 23-h009 AIO computer.

Processor: AMD A6 5200 APU 2.00 GHz (quad core)
Touch Screen, 8GB of RAM,
1TB HD (SATA)
Blu Tooth
Ntwork:
wifi: Ralink RT3290 802.11 bgn
Ethernet: Realtek PCIe
Display: AMD Radeon HD8400

One of the main thing here, is how well my teenager's ipod/itunes music library will interact with whatever music app can be used on LL. Clementine/gtkpod.
Reply
#2
As hardware is concerned... 2.0 Ghz quad core and 8gb ram - When LL3.0 is available I'm sure it will be plenty beefy..
I can't comment on the touch screen - I don't have anything to test but I think I've seen someone here..

If you haven't yet you can always run a liveUSB environment of 2.8 on the system to see how well the drivers work.. Remember 2.8 is 3.19 kernel, LL3.0 probably a 4.x??

LL4.8 UEFI 64 bit ASUS E402W - AMD E2 (Quad) 1.5Ghz  - 4GB - AMD Mullins Radeon R2
LL5.8 UEFI 64 bit Test UEFI Kangaroo (Mobile Desktop) - Atom X5-Z8500 1.44Ghz - 2GB - Intel HD Graphics
LL4.8 64 bit HP 6005- AMD Phenom II X2 - 8GB - AMD/ATI RS880 (HD4200)
LL3.8 32 bit Dell Inspiron Mini - Atom N270 1.6Ghz - 1GB - Intel Mobile 945GSE Express  -- Shelved
BACK LL5.8 64 bit Dell Optiplex 160 (Thin) - Atom 230 1.6Ghz - 4GB-SiS 771/671 PCIE VGA - Print Server
Running Linux Lite since LL2.2
Reply
#3
Yeah. A test with live USB is great idea.

Thanks  Smile.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)