LL 2.8 or 3.0 -which is better suited for HP 23-h009? - Printable Version +- Linux Lite Forums (https://www.freecinema2022.gq/forums) +-- Forum: Software - Support (https://www.freecinema2022.gq/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=5) +--- Forum: Installing Software (https://www.freecinema2022.gq/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=18) +--- Thread: LL 2.8 or 3.0 -which is better suited for HP 23-h009? (/showthread.php?tid=2805) |
LL 2.8 or 3.0 -which is better suited for HP 23-h009? - nublix - 03-28-2016 Is LL 2.8 orĀ (3.0 to come) is better suited to ? Of the 38 results from the LL Hdware dbase, this system was not listed there. (yet?) HP Pavilion, 23-h009 AIO computer. Processor: AMD A6 5200 APU 2.00 GHz (quad core) Touch Screen, 8GB of RAM, 1TB HD (SATA) Blu Tooth Ntwork: wifi: Ralink RT3290 802.11 bgn Ethernet: Realtek PCIe Display: AMD Radeon HD8400 One of the main thing here, is how well my teenager's ipod/itunes music library will interact with whatever music app can be used on LL. Clementine/gtkpod. Re: LL 2.8 or 3.0 -which is better suited for HP 23-h009? - firenice03 - 03-28-2016 As hardware is concerned... 2.0 Ghz quad core and 8gb ram - When LL3.0 is available I'm sure it will be plenty beefy.. I can't comment on the touch screen - I don't have anything to test but I think I've seen someone here.. If you haven't yet you can always run a liveUSB environment of 2.8 on the system to see how well the drivers work.. Remember 2.8 is 3.19 kernel, LL3.0 probably a 4.x?? Re: LL 2.8 or 3.0 -which is better suited for HP 23-h009? - nublix - 03-29-2016 Yeah. A test with live USB is great idea. ThanksĀ . |