Posts: 893
Threads: 197
Joined: Jul 2014
Reputation:
0
01-12-2018, 01:03 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-12-2018, 01:52 PM by m654321.)
Over the years, I've collected several laptop HDDs, particularly now that we've converted all our household's computers to the much faster SSDs.
However, I don't really want to get rid of these old drives, especially if I can find a use for them.
If I could somehow combine these HDDs (they vary in size from 250GB to 1TB) into one large drive, then I could use them
for external data storage, via USB connectivity.
Could someone either explain to me how I can do this, or at least point me in the right direction?
Many thanks - much appreciated.
Mike
64bit OS (32-bit on Samsung[i] netbook) installed in [i]Legacy mode on MBR-formatted SSDs (except pi which uses a micro SDHC card):
2017 - Raspberry pi 3B (4cores) ~ [email protected] - LibreElec, used for upgrading our Samsung TV (excellent for the task)
2012 - Lenovo G580 2689 (2cores; 4threads] ~ [email protected] - LL3.8/Win8.1 dual-boot (LL working smoothly)
2011 - Samsung NP-N145 Plus (1core; 2threads) ~ Intel Atom [email protected] - LL 3.8 32-bit (64-bit too 'laggy')
2008 - Asus X71Q (2cores) ~ Intel [email protected] - LL4.6/Win8.1 dual-boot, LL works fine with kernel 4.15
2007 - Dell Latitude D630 (2cores) ~ Intel [email protected] - LL4.6, works well with kernel 4.4; 4.15 doesn't work
Posts: 3,237
Threads: 125
Joined: Jul 2014
Reputation:
0
01-12-2018, 02:21 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-12-2018, 02:24 PM by bitsnpcs.)
Posts: 857
Threads: 47
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation:
0
[member=411]bitsnpcs[/member] - Very good information, thank you.
Posts: 3,237
Threads: 125
Joined: Jul 2014
Reputation:
0
[member=47]Scott[/member] I'll try it too when I replace the 32 bit desktops this year.
Posts: 1,133
Threads: 87
Joined: Sep 2017
Reputation:
0
[member=411]bitsnpcs[/member] Such a nice informaton! I didn't even ever think this was possible. Bookmarked!
Posts: 3,237
Threads: 125
Joined: Jul 2014
Reputation:
0
01-13-2018, 02:05 AM
(This post was last modified: 01-13-2018, 02:09 AM by bitsnpcs.)
[member=7109]Moltke[/member] if many spare hdd combined -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3ufUXZafAk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tUL2vesXu0o
It seems there can be made "pools", a combined group effort, it could be done by a community, as a source of funding for a project/s.
Posts: 893
Threads: 197
Joined: Jul 2014
Reputation:
0
01-13-2018, 07:59 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-13-2018, 08:05 PM by m654321.)
(01-12-2018, 02:21 PM)bitsnpcs link Wrote: Hello Mike,
for Linux - https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions...ard-drives
Additional info click through on the above reply - https://www.howtoforge.com/linux_lvm
Many thanks btsnpcs - very useful information.
The only reservation I have now, after reading the links you gave, is that if one of the drives (within the larger spanned drive) fails, then you risk losing all the data - a significant consideration !
Therefore, bearing this in mind, the spanned drive would need to be backed-up frequently to mitigate against such data loss occurring ...
Many thanks again - much appreciated.
64bit OS (32-bit on Samsung[i] netbook) installed in [i]Legacy mode on MBR-formatted SSDs (except pi which uses a micro SDHC card):
2017 - Raspberry pi 3B (4cores) ~ [email protected] - LibreElec, used for upgrading our Samsung TV (excellent for the task)
2012 - Lenovo G580 2689 (2cores; 4threads] ~ [email protected] - LL3.8/Win8.1 dual-boot (LL working smoothly)
2011 - Samsung NP-N145 Plus (1core; 2threads) ~ Intel Atom [email protected] - LL 3.8 32-bit (64-bit too 'laggy')
2008 - Asus X71Q (2cores) ~ Intel [email protected] - LL4.6/Win8.1 dual-boot, LL works fine with kernel 4.15
2007 - Dell Latitude D630 (2cores) ~ Intel [email protected] - LL4.6, works well with kernel 4.4; 4.15 doesn't work
Posts: 201
Threads: 21
Joined: Jun 2014
Reputation:
0
(01-12-2018, 02:21 PM)bitsnpcs link Wrote: Many thanks btsnpcs - very useful information.
The only reservation I have now, after reading the links you gave, is that if one of the drives (within the larger spanned drive) fails, then you risk losing all the data - a significant consideration !
Therefore, bearing this in mind, the spanned drive would need to be backed-up frequently to mitigate against such data loss occurring ...
Many thanks again - much appreciated.
If a single high capacity HDD fails, the same situation applies - possibility of loss of all data! The question is, is one or more of three spanned drives any more likely to fail than a single drive? Whatever the system, backup is essential but then the backup device may fail. What then? I used CDR/DVR in the past but after storage some became unreadable.
My objection to spanned drives would be the increased noise and power requirements and my strategy would be to convert each drive to USB and use independently.
1) Lenovo T520 i5 LL3.8 8GB ram, fast & stable
2) Medion P4 32bit LL3.8 1GB ram, quite fast & stable
3) eeePC 901 32bit LL3.8 1GB ram, fast & stable
4) eeePC 701 32bit LL3.8 1GB ram, slower & stable but small and light enough to travel with me to New Zealand when visiting family in Blenheim.
Posts: 3,237
Threads: 125
Joined: Jul 2014
Reputation:
0
(01-13-2018, 07:59 PM)m654321 link Wrote: Many thanks btsnpcs - very useful information.
The only reservation I have now, after reading the links you gave, is that if one of the drives (within the larger spanned drive) fails, then you risk losing all the data - a significant consideration !
Therefore, bearing this in mind, the spanned drive would need to be backed-up frequently to mitigate against such data loss occurring ...
Many thanks again - much appreciated.
[member=458]m654321[/member] you are right, it is an important consideration when making the decision as to how many to span and how many to use as single backups of specific data as [member=296]justme2[/member] writes.
Possibly if there is a drive health tool, like defraggler for Linux, they could be checked, benchmarked and regularly as part of maintenance routine.
Posts: 893
Threads: 197
Joined: Jul 2014
Reputation:
0
01-14-2018, 08:46 AM
(This post was last modified: 01-14-2018, 08:53 AM by m654321.)
(01-13-2018, 09:38 PM)justme2 link Wrote: [quote author=bitsnpcs link=topic=5001.msg37823#msg37823 date=1515766899]
Many thanks btsnpcs - very useful information.
The only reservation I have now, after reading the links you gave, is that if one of the drives (within the larger spanned drive) fails, then you risk losing all the data - a significant consideration !
Therefore, bearing this in mind, the spanned drive would need to be backed-up frequently to mitigate against such data loss occurring ...
Many thanks again - much appreciated. If a single high capacity HDD fails, the same situation applies - possibility of loss of all data! The question is, is one or more of three spanned drives any more likely to fail than a single drive?
[/quote]
The answer to that is yes.
The probability or chance of any given single drive failing, no matter how small the risk, is the same, with the caveat of all things being equal: drive type, make etc.
If you have 4 of these drives combined to make 1 larger drive, then the probability of the larger drive failing is increased 4 times, i.e. you sum the probabilities for the risk for each of the component drives.
Any mathematicians out there, please correct me if I'm not making sense on probabilities ... :o
Yes, not very good from an energy consumption point of view either, especially if you have several of these: e.g. around 5 to 10 Amps current drain for 10 drives!
Mike
64bit OS (32-bit on Samsung[i] netbook) installed in [i]Legacy mode on MBR-formatted SSDs (except pi which uses a micro SDHC card):
2017 - Raspberry pi 3B (4cores) ~ [email protected] - LibreElec, used for upgrading our Samsung TV (excellent for the task)
2012 - Lenovo G580 2689 (2cores; 4threads] ~ [email protected] - LL3.8/Win8.1 dual-boot (LL working smoothly)
2011 - Samsung NP-N145 Plus (1core; 2threads) ~ Intel Atom [email protected] - LL 3.8 32-bit (64-bit too 'laggy')
2008 - Asus X71Q (2cores) ~ Intel [email protected] - LL4.6/Win8.1 dual-boot, LL works fine with kernel 4.15
2007 - Dell Latitude D630 (2cores) ~ Intel [email protected] - LL4.6, works well with kernel 4.4; 4.15 doesn't work
|