not booting with grub2

[Kirkx]

In case it helps, I boot my Linux Lite v2.0 from Grub4Dos w/o any problems. I guess this way you boot the kernel directly, bypassing the file /boot/grub/grub.cfg. Here is my menu.lst from Grub4Dos:

## Grub4Dos Boot Menu

color white/blue blue/yellow red/yellow red/yellow
# timeout 30
# default 0

# title Windows XP
# chainloader (hd0,0)/ntldr

title Linux Lite (core.img)
kernel (hd0,6)/boot/grub/i386-pc/core.img

title Linux Lite (vmlinuz)
root (hd0,6)
# kernel /boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-24-generic root=UUID=b5c7940e-453b-4eed-8d87-bb992069026c ro  splash quiet $vt_handoff
kernel /boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-24-generic root=UUID=b5c7940e-453b-4eed-8d87-bb992069026c ro
initrd /boot/initrd.img-3.13.0-24-generic

title Reboot
reboot

title Halt
halt

Partition (hd0,6) in Grub4Dos translates to /dev/sda7 in LL.

I didn't want to have my original MBR overwritten by Grub2 so I installed it at the root partition of LL. When you look at my menu.lst you can see that I can boot to LL using either core.img or vmlinuz. I also got rid of the boot splash screen by removing the parameter "splash quiet $vt_handoff".

[davesurrey999]

Hi Kirk,
Thanks for the reply.
For the record as of today I've now tried this on 3 different boxes, with 2 burns from 2 downloads and with grub2 in the mbr of Lubuntu 14.04, Linux Mint 17 and OpenMandriva 2014-kde and so I am convinced the issue is with LL 2.0.
I have done a manual entry into grub2 's 40_custom file as follows:

menuentry "Linux KLite 2.0 on sda2" {
set root=(hd0,2)
linux  (hd0,2)/boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-24-generic  root=/dev/sda2
initrd  (hd0,2)/boot/initrd.img-3.13.0-24-generic
}
EOF

and it boots well. 

I hope one of the devs can sort this out one day.
Hopefully this thread will help others.
Dave

[gold_finger]

Just in case people here haven't seen, Valtam responded to this issue here:  https://www.freecinema2022.gq/forums/index...31#msg2431.

[davesurrey]

Thanks gold_finger. I tried and couldn't get it to work as I've reported over there.

[robert]

I know I'm still learning Linux and understand what you guys are talking about, but.
LL is aimed at Windoze people to tempt them to move over to Linux and so works great at dual booting with XP or 7.
So for the intended audience it works.  I for one am very pleased with it.

[gold_finger]

I know I'm still learning Linux and understand what you guys are talking about, but.
LL is aimed at Windoze people to tempt them to move over to Linux and so works great at dual booting with XP or 7.
So for the intended audience it works.  I for one am very pleased with it.

Sorry Robert -- I somehow missed your post under this topic.

You are absolutely right.  It is working as it should for the target audience -- newcomers from Windows.  As Valtam explained in above referenced link, he made a slight change to eliminate an issue that had caused some confusion in the past.

I haven't bothered trying to alter grub just to keep another distro in charge of booting.  Instead, I just put Linux Lite in charge of booting and everything then works fine.  I don't really care which distro is handling the boot process, so it's no big deal.

[jordan]

I tried LL 2.0 when it was released and received the an error, "unexpected entry, filename incorrect" (or something similar) when choosing Linux Lite from my Grub menu which includes 4 other Linux distros and no Windows. Also, I am letting another distro control Grub.

I just yesterday installed LL 2.2 and received the identical error. Any simple (that's a relative term I know) solutions beyond allowing LL to control Grub?

Thanks in advance! 

[altman]

One thing that I use when having Grub issues is Rescatux , download latest , burn it on an ISO , reboot and try to fix-update grub from it . It worked on my end .

[jordan]

Thanks altman 

I've used Rescatux in the past and it is a useful program. In this case, Grub is working fine for the other 4 distros in the menu. It's only when I choose LL that I am getting the filename error. I've read that if I change Grub control to LL, the issue will go away but I'm not prepared to do that at this point.

[gold_finger]

I've read that if I change Grub control to LL, the issue will go away but I'm not prepared to do that at this point.

Are you hesitating to due that because you are unsure that it will work?  I don't remember what the change to LL system was (as previously described elsewhere by Jerry) that causes the error message when another OS is in charge of booting, but making LL in charge of boot process should allow booting of all OS's.

If you'd like to try, can provide instructions and also give instructions to make a backup copy of current MBR so if attempt to switch control fails you can easily restore prior boot process.


If you'd rather not have LL in control for some other reason, please let us know what the other OS's are and which one is currently in control of booting.  Maybe one of us can provide alternate solution to add LL boot option to it.