Linux Lite Forums › Software - Support › Other v
micro SD cards not recognized


LINUX LITE 7.2 FINAL RELEASED - SEE RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS SECTION FOR DETAILS


Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Threaded Mode
micro SD cards not recognized
adml Offline

Posts: 35
Threads: 2
Joined: Mar 2021
Reputation: 0
#11
03-10-2021, 04:27 PM (This post was last modified: 03-10-2021, 04:57 PM by adml.)
[member=5414]firenice03[/member]

Listed below is the output of lsblk, only the 64 GB internal drive is showing. Secure boot is disabled in the BIOS.

While doing some more searching about this I came across the following:

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204003

This kernel.org bug report concerns the card readers of Intel NUC PCs not being recognized and indicates that the issue seems to be kernel specific.  However, I don't believe that it's a kernel issue in my case and here's why. I booted a live USB of LL 5.2 on a Lenovo 120S 14 inch laptop and the card reader was recognized. But the card reader is not recognized on my Lenovo 100S, either on the current install, or on a live USB boot (which I just tried).

I did notice that on the USB boot on the 120S that several rtsx modules were loaded, while on both the installed, and USB boot of my 100S no rtsx modules are loaded. Would these modules not being loaded have an impact ?

output of lsblk:

NAME        MAJ:MIN RM  SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
mmcblk0      179:0    0 58.2G  0 disk
├─mmcblk0p1  179:1    0  512M  0 part /boot/efi
└─mmcblk0p2  179:2    0 57.8G  0 part /
mmcblk0boot0 179:8    0    4M  1 disk
mmcblk0boot1 179:16  0    4M  1 disk


Find
Reply
firenice03 Offline
Super Moderator
******
Posts: 1,849
Threads: 21
Joined: Sep 2015
Reputation: 0
#12
03-10-2021, 09:33 PM
[member=45699]adml[/member]

[size=1em]Note here https://askubuntu.com/questions/939410/l...oesnt-show [/size]
[size=1em]a slight difference in kernel 4.10 (broke) vs 4.8 (worked) .. [/size]

Code:
Linux TRCD-Kangaroo 5.4.0-54-generic #60-Ubuntu SMP Fri Nov 6 10:37:59 UTC 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

[size=1em]I'm running LL5.2 from an SD Card/MMC[/size]

Code:
lsblk
NAME         MAJ:MIN RM  SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
mmcblk0      179:0    0 29.1G  0 disk
├─mmcblk0p1  179:1    0  100M  0 part /boot/efi
├─mmcblk0p2  179:2    0   16M  0 part
├─mmcblk0p3  179:3    0 28.6G  0 part
└─mmcblk0p4  179:4    0  450M  0 part
mmcblk0boot0 179:8    0    4M  1 disk
mmcblk0boot1 179:16   0    4M  1 disk
mmcblk1      179:24   0 29.7G  0 disk
├─mmcblk1p1  179:25   0 27.8G  0 part /
└─mmcblk1p2  179:26   0  1.9G  0 part [SWAP]


[size=1em]I would use Lite Tweaks - Kernel Installer to Test Kernel 4.8 - select and install - reboot, select Advanced in Grub to change to 4.8 all ow to finish booting... [/size]
[size=1em]If so = Smile [/size]
[size=1em]If not ... Can remove with Kernel Remover will need to reboot and choose another kernel prior - remover will not remove the in use kernel.... [/size]

LL4.8 UEFI 64 bit ASUS E402W - AMD E2 (Quad) 1.5Ghz  - 4GB - AMD Mullins Radeon R2
LL5.8 UEFI 64 bit Test UEFI Kangaroo (Mobile Desktop) - Atom X5-Z8500 1.44Ghz - 2GB - Intel HD Graphics
LL4.8 64 bit HP 6005- AMD Phenom II X2 - 8GB - AMD/ATI RS880 (HD4200)
LL3.8 32 bit Dell Inspiron Mini - Atom N270 1.6Ghz - 1GB - Intel Mobile 945GSE Express  -- Shelved
BACK LL5.8 64 bit Dell Optiplex 160 (Thin) - Atom 230 1.6Ghz - 4GB-SiS 771/671 PCIE VGA - Print Server
Running Linux Lite since LL2.2
Find
Reply
adml Offline

Posts: 35
Threads: 2
Joined: Mar 2021
Reputation: 0
#13
03-10-2021, 10:54 PM
[member=5414]firenice03[/member]

I'm starting to think that this laptop must be jinxed.

When I try to install 4.8.0 I get a message that there was an error downloading and installing the kernel. The message also asks if I want to view the logs. I click yes and the log window comes up, but, it is empty, there's nothing at all in the log. Have you ever heard of this occurring before ?
Find
Reply
firenice03 Offline
Super Moderator
******
Posts: 1,849
Threads: 21
Joined: Sep 2015
Reputation: 0
#14
03-11-2021, 03:32 AM
[member=45699]adml[/member]
Not with Kernel tools - I have used multiple times...

Did you install LL5.x with UEFI enabled and SecureBoot disabled -- this would be the ideal/preferred... For 64-bit UEFI...
OR
Did you install "Legacy" where UEFI is disabled (hence legacy BIOS) ?

If secureboot is enable - the card will not be read at boot and ?maybe? be causing some grief....
I'm also seeing where the 100S may have came with a 64 bit OS 32 bit UEFI (hybrids) - again curious on install...

hhhmmmm
LL4.8 UEFI 64 bit ASUS E402W - AMD E2 (Quad) 1.5Ghz  - 4GB - AMD Mullins Radeon R2
LL5.8 UEFI 64 bit Test UEFI Kangaroo (Mobile Desktop) - Atom X5-Z8500 1.44Ghz - 2GB - Intel HD Graphics
LL4.8 64 bit HP 6005- AMD Phenom II X2 - 8GB - AMD/ATI RS880 (HD4200)
LL3.8 32 bit Dell Inspiron Mini - Atom N270 1.6Ghz - 1GB - Intel Mobile 945GSE Express  -- Shelved
BACK LL5.8 64 bit Dell Optiplex 160 (Thin) - Atom 230 1.6Ghz - 4GB-SiS 771/671 PCIE VGA - Print Server
Running Linux Lite since LL2.2
Find
Reply
adml Offline

Posts: 35
Threads: 2
Joined: Mar 2021
Reputation: 0
#15
03-11-2021, 04:04 AM
[member=5414]firenice03[/member]

LL 5.2 was installed on the 100S-14IBR with UEFI enabled and Secure Boot disabled.

Can you point me to where you are seeing the 64/32 information, this is the first that I've heard of it for this PC.

Interestingly, I have LL 5.2 installed on an ASUS X205TA which is a 64/32 hybrid. The installation went off without a hitch, all I needed to do was to change one setting in Rufus when copying the image to the USB drive. The card reader on the ASUS does work, however bluetooth does not work, but, that's another story...

Given the above information regarding UEFI and Secure Boot, any thoughts on what I can try next for the card reader ? Also, what do you make of me being unable to switch kernels and the log being blank ? I just tried Lite Tweaks again and the result was exactly the same.
Find
Reply
firenice03 Offline
Super Moderator
******
Posts: 1,849
Threads: 21
Joined: Sep 2015
Reputation: 0
#16
03-11-2021, 04:15 AM (This post was last modified: 03-11-2021, 04:21 AM by firenice03.)
[member=45699]adml[/member]
I'll try to find where I saw the 32bit... its a long shot... If you look here you can see the commands to install the kernels...
https://www.freecinema2022.gq/forums/linux.../#msg55015



**UPDATE**
Came across this https://askubuntu.com/questions/787088/s...untu-16-04
may also be worth a try.. the reinstall udisks...
LL4.8 UEFI 64 bit ASUS E402W - AMD E2 (Quad) 1.5Ghz  - 4GB - AMD Mullins Radeon R2
LL5.8 UEFI 64 bit Test UEFI Kangaroo (Mobile Desktop) - Atom X5-Z8500 1.44Ghz - 2GB - Intel HD Graphics
LL4.8 64 bit HP 6005- AMD Phenom II X2 - 8GB - AMD/ATI RS880 (HD4200)
LL3.8 32 bit Dell Inspiron Mini - Atom N270 1.6Ghz - 1GB - Intel Mobile 945GSE Express  -- Shelved
BACK LL5.8 64 bit Dell Optiplex 160 (Thin) - Atom 230 1.6Ghz - 4GB-SiS 771/671 PCIE VGA - Print Server
Running Linux Lite since LL2.2
Find
Reply
WytWun Offline

*****
Posts: 102
Threads: 3
Joined: Jun 2017
Reputation: 0
#17
03-11-2021, 12:58 PM
The issue with the 32bit UEFI on 64bit capable systems is fairly specific to systems with the intel Baytrail/Cherrytrail Atom CPUs - such as the 100s-11IBY I mentioned (and have posted about in other UEFI related threads).  The OP's 100s-14IBR has an intel Braswell CPU and I believe all those have 64bit UEFI.

As best I can tell, there's something very specifically different with the OP's system which is going to require a fairly detailed review using all the details available from tools like lspci to identify.  As the Lenovo Windows card reader driver is for Realtek hardware, the intel SD card reader support mentioned in other sources is at best only part of the picture and likely completely misleading.  There is a Realtek MMC PCI (as well as USB) driver included in the config as a module.  The final answer is I'd guess likely to involve having to specify a kernel option via Grub, but exactly what that would be needs more research.

I'd hoped my 100s-IBY would be close enough hardware-wise to help, but it apparently isn't Sad
Find
Reply
firenice03 Offline
Super Moderator
******
Posts: 1,849
Threads: 21
Joined: Sep 2015
Reputation: 0
#18
03-12-2021, 12:56 AM
Perhaps in my searching - the models crisscrossed relating to the 32-bit.. .
As in the link - I think the earlier kernel may have the driver loaded - which if tests out, it may hopefully point out that drive - then attempting to add to a later...

But then becomes - why cant a different kernel be loaded..

LL4.8 UEFI 64 bit ASUS E402W - AMD E2 (Quad) 1.5Ghz  - 4GB - AMD Mullins Radeon R2
LL5.8 UEFI 64 bit Test UEFI Kangaroo (Mobile Desktop) - Atom X5-Z8500 1.44Ghz - 2GB - Intel HD Graphics
LL4.8 64 bit HP 6005- AMD Phenom II X2 - 8GB - AMD/ATI RS880 (HD4200)
LL3.8 32 bit Dell Inspiron Mini - Atom N270 1.6Ghz - 1GB - Intel Mobile 945GSE Express  -- Shelved
BACK LL5.8 64 bit Dell Optiplex 160 (Thin) - Atom 230 1.6Ghz - 4GB-SiS 771/671 PCIE VGA - Print Server
Running Linux Lite since LL2.2
Find
Reply
adml Offline

Posts: 35
Threads: 2
Joined: Mar 2021
Reputation: 0
#19
03-12-2021, 02:13 AM
[member=6968]WytWun[/member]

Thank you for the input, and the help. As you will see in my next post, I can't install the 4.8.0 kernel, to see if that rectifies the problem, from either Lite Tweaks or the command line.


Find
Reply
adml Offline

Posts: 35
Threads: 2
Joined: Mar 2021
Reputation: 0
#20
03-12-2021, 02:20 AM
[member=5414]firenice03[/member]

Reinstalled udisks and there was no change.

Tried to install the 4.8.0 kernel from the command line and the results are below. I'm thinking that the reason that I couldn't install the kernel from Lite Tweaks is the same as the reason listed below, although the Lite Tweaks log was blank. Would you interpret the command line messages for me ? They are over my head at this point in time. Would a reinstall of LL 5.2 correct what is showing in the command line messages, which would then allow me to install 4.8.0 to give it a try ?

command line output:

Hit:1 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal InRelease
Hit:2 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-updates InRelease                                                                   
Hit:3 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-security InRelease                                                                     
Hit:4 http://repo.linuxliteos.com/linuxlite emerald InRelease                                                                       
Hit:5 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-backports InRelease                                                                 
Hit:6 https://deb.opera.com/opera-stable stable InRelease                                                                 
Hit:7 http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu focal InRelease                                           
Reading package lists... Done
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree     
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
linux-headers-linuxlite-4.8.0 : Depends: libssl1.0.0 (>= 1.0.0) but it is not installable
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
Find
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 8 Guest(s)