LINUX LITE 7.2 FINAL RELEASED - SEE RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS SECTION FOR DETAILS


Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
'dist-upgrade' vs Lite Update
#1
Is there any difference between using the Lite Update tool and using the 'dist-upgrade' command?
Reply
#2
I believe so.  The upgrade may include changes in repository information and other stuff that "dist-upgrade" may not include.
Reply
#3
(04-06-2019, 10:29 PM)Artim link Wrote: I believe so.  The upgrade may include changes in repository information and other stuff that "dist-upgrade" may not include.
It would be intuitive for the Lite Update to have extended or maybe better tailored functions than the 'dist-upgrade', but I can hardly recall any time when one run right after the other would add anything further. On the other hand, if 'dist-upgrade' added anything beyond the Lite Update, it could basically spoil the carefully selected out list of things, even if run once, summoning an entire mass of leftover updates.
Reply
#4
What is 'Lite Update'? I can't address this unless I understand the content.
Reply
#5
(04-07-2019, 01:47 AM)Jerry link Wrote: What is 'Lite Update'? I can't address this unless I understand the content.
It is simply the "Install Updates" thing, not to be mistaken with "Lite Upgrade" though.
Reply
#6
dist-upgrade is used in Install Updates. We don't use apt-upgrade because:

Quote:dist-upgrade in addition to performing the function of apt-upgrade,
    also intelligently handles changing dependencies with new versions
    of packages; apt-get has a "smart" conflict resolution system, and
    it will attempt to upgrade the most important packages at the
    expense of less important ones if necessary. So, dist-upgrade
    command may remove some packages. The /etc/apt/sources.list file
    contains a list of locations from which to retrieve desired package
    files. See also apt_preferences(5) for a mechanism for overriding
    the general settings for individual packages.

This will never change and is the way we will always do our Updates.
Reply
#7
Great, good to know, just asking.
Reply
#8
You mean, upgrading the system? But what does it differ between 'dist-upgrade' command and the Lite Update?
Reply
#9
(05-08-2019, 05:10 PM)MS link Wrote: You mean, upgrading the system? But what does it differ between 'dist-upgrade' command and the Lite Update?
Jerry answered this question in the first line of reply #5: the Install Updates app, under Favourites in the Menu  (which you refer to as Lite Update), uses the dist-upgrade command to carry out updating
64bit OS (32-bit on Samsung[i] netbook) installed in [i]Legacy mode on MBR-formatted SSDs (except pi which uses a micro SDHC card):
2017 - Raspberry pi 3B (4cores) ~ [email protected] - LibreElec, used for upgrading our Samsung TV (excellent for the task)  
2012 - Lenovo G580 2689 (2cores; 4threads] ~ [email protected] - LL3.8/Win8.1 dual-boot (LL working smoothly)
2011 - Samsung NP-N145 Plus (1core; 2threads) ~ Intel Atom [email protected] - LL 3.8 32-bit (64-bit too 'laggy')
2008 - Asus X71Q (2cores) ~ Intel [email protected] - LL4.6/Win8.1 dual-boot, LL works fine with kernel 4.15
2007 - Dell Latitude D630 (2cores) ~ Intel [email protected] - LL4.6, works well with kernel 4.4; 4.15 doesn't work
Reply
#10
(05-09-2019, 04:33 AM)m654321 link Wrote: [quote author=MS link=topic=6368.msg47041#msg47041 date=1557335425]
You mean, upgrading the system? But what does it differ between 'dist-upgrade' command and the Lite Update?
Jerry answered this question in the first line of reply #5: the Install Updates app, under Favourites in the Menu  (which you refer to as Lite Update), uses the dist-upgrade command to carry out updating
[/quote]
Huh, thanks.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)