LINUX LITE 7.2 FINAL RELEASED - SEE RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS SECTION FOR DETAILS


Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Linux Lite 3.2 Final Released
#41
Hi
Thanks to the Team for a good release.
24 hrs later and all running smoothly - no blips along the way.
Regards Zeb...
Be Nice or Be Some Where Else - Linux User #565092
x64 Desktop - Intel® Core™ i7-6700K CPU @ 4.00GHz - 32Gb RAM - NVIDIA GTX 960 4Gb - 34"  WQHD 3440x1440
x64 Laptop - Dual core Intel i5-4200U - 8Gb RAM - Intel Integrated Graphics - 15.6"  HD 1920x1080
Reply
#42
Thanks for highlighting the problem and the quick solution, only took a few minutes to redo Smile

Keith.
Reply
#43
Excellent job for LL3.2, Jerry & all the devs.

One thing I'm intrigued about with LL3.2. Most of the time I use an ESET antivirus for Linux though apparently it is not supported by SystemD - I found that out when I tried to install it on Lubuntu 16.04 for my son - needless to say it wasn't compatible.  However, with LL 3.0 and 3.2, ESET works out of the box ... well done for that.

The upgrading from LL3.0 to 3.2 went smoothly.  However, it had the unintended consequence of upgrading an older version of Supertuxkart (0.8.1-2) to the current 0.9 version, which I didn't want as the graphics card in the PC is too old to run 0.9.  How can I prevent LL doing this in future series upgrades?

Many thanks for any advice on the above and keep up the great work that you and all the devs do

Regards
Mike
64bit OS (32-bit on Samsung[i] netbook) installed in [i]Legacy mode on MBR-formatted SSDs (except pi which uses a micro SDHC card):
2017 - Raspberry pi 3B (4cores) ~ [email protected] - LibreElec, used for upgrading our Samsung TV (excellent for the task)  
2012 - Lenovo G580 2689 (2cores; 4threads] ~ [email protected] - LL3.8/Win8.1 dual-boot (LL working smoothly)
2011 - Samsung NP-N145 Plus (1core; 2threads) ~ Intel Atom [email protected] - LL 3.8 32-bit (64-bit too 'laggy')
2008 - Asus X71Q (2cores) ~ Intel [email protected] - LL4.6/Win8.1 dual-boot, LL works fine with kernel 4.15
2007 - Dell Latitude D630 (2cores) ~ Intel [email protected] - LL4.6, works well with kernel 4.4; 4.15 doesn't work
Reply
#44
Thanks Zebedee Boss, banko, m654321, UltraCookie, bonnevie, TMG1961, LL-user, firenice03, thoughtinstinct, Coastie & trinidad Smile
Reply
#45
(11-04-2016, 04:27 AM)Jerry link Wrote: As the Spanish say..."no problemo"

8)
[Image: EtYqOrS.png%5D]

Left Mac OS X for Linux in Jan 2014
Reply
#46
LL Jerry = Ladies LOVE Jerry or linux lite Jerry,

thanks for all your work.

Lite upgrade from 3.0 to 3.2 not working on my desktop. the Upgrade in the menu is not available (I looked very closely) even searchbared the update and upgrade did not get it.
I wonder if the package did not get installed initially for some reason
FYI
it is a tri-boot system W10, WVista, LL3.0 and I had a bear of a time getting that to work but I can boot all 3 os's native now (not virtual)
I wonder if the package was missed or corrupted in the original LL3.0 install?  I had great difficulty just getting it to update period. 

info below from term commands

Code:
cat /etc/llver
Linux Lite 3.0p5qlinux@p5qlinux-Desk:~

Code:
sudo apt-get upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.

Code:
sudo apt-get dist-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Xpocalypse NOW I love smell of OS in the morning, Smells like 01110110011010010110001101110100011011110111001001111001
Linux user since January 14, 2014
[Image: ralph.jpg]I can look up things on the internet!
Reply
#47
I take it you followed the steps in the Release Announcement?

Sent from my Phone using Tapatalk

Reply
#48
(11-04-2016, 03:35 PM)XpRefugee link Wrote: Lite upgrade from 3.0 to 3.2 not working on my desktop. the Upgrade in the menu is not available (I looked very closely) even searchbared the update and upgrade did not get it.
I wonder if the package did not get installed initially for some reason

I too briefly suffered from the eluded Lite Upgrade... I checked my repo's and the LL repo was unchecked once checked and updates ran, the Lite Upgrade was available...

I figured I inadvertently unchecked it... Pretty sure it was the citrine repo; not by my pc to confirm tho...
Maybe the same for you???
LL4.8 UEFI 64 bit ASUS E402W - AMD E2 (Quad) 1.5Ghz  - 4GB - AMD Mullins Radeon R2
LL5.8 UEFI 64 bit Test UEFI Kangaroo (Mobile Desktop) - Atom X5-Z8500 1.44Ghz - 2GB - Intel HD Graphics
LL4.8 64 bit HP 6005- AMD Phenom II X2 - 8GB - AMD/ATI RS880 (HD4200)
LL3.8 32 bit Dell Inspiron Mini - Atom N270 1.6Ghz - 1GB - Intel Mobile 945GSE Express  -- Shelved
BACK LL5.8 64 bit Dell Optiplex 160 (Thin) - Atom 230 1.6Ghz - 4GB-SiS 771/671 PCIE VGA - Print Server
Running Linux Lite since LL2.2
Reply
#49
Beside checking the LL repo as firenice03 pointed out what is the output of
Code:
sudo apt-get update
Reply
#50
(11-04-2016, 03:47 PM)Jerry link Wrote: I take it you followed the steps in the Release Announcement?

Sent from my Phone using Tapatalk
I did on my lappy
> Menu, Favorites, Install Updates
> Menu, Settings, Lite Upgrade
Worked great this option is missing on my desktop though
yes it was disabled in the list
When I enabled the repo I got an error.  looked at my working laptop and I guess? it was pointed to xenial and needed to be citrine
Once I changed that and updated
The menu options were there thanks to all I wont muck up the thread any more.
Xpocalypse NOW I love smell of OS in the morning, Smells like 01110110011010010110001101110100011011110111001001111001
Linux user since January 14, 2014
[Image: ralph.jpg]I can look up things on the internet!
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 18 Guest(s)