Posts: 508
Threads: 55
Joined: Jan 2015
09-02-2015, 03:04 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-15-2016, 09:11 AM by Jocklad.)
Thinking of buying a new internal drive.
Have always used HDD but thinking about SSD.
Will SSD work okay on older machines....?.
Grateful for any advice.
Jocklad
Posts: 508
Threads: 55
Joined: Jan 2015
Thanks Wirezfree.
Will have a good look at that.
Jocklad
Posts: 1,599
Threads: 86
Joined: Jun 2015
Reputation:
0
To Jocklad,
You might also want to consider SSHD (Solid State Hybrid Drive).
Want to thank me? Click my [Thank] link.
Posts: 28
Threads: 5
Joined: Jul 2015
Reputation:
0
I hate to disagree with someone on here, but even just regular sata has a theoretical top speed of 2g/s. Not many consumer grade SSDs have a top speed higher than that. Also you might want to get a small SSD and a HDD for mass storge, or if you have a NAS you might think about using that.
Posts: 1,484
Threads: 96
Joined: Mar 2014
Reputation:
0
@Austin Payne,
These are my measured speeds on my best PC with SATA3
This is my SSD(Samsung 850Pro):
dave@sm-xh97:~$ sudo hdparm -t /dev/sda
[sudo] password for dave:
/dev/sda:
Timing buffered disk reads: 1560 MB in 3.00 seconds = 519.37 MB/sec
dave@sm-xh97:~$
This is my HD(Western Digital - Black)
dave@sm-xh97:~$ sudo hdparm -t /dev/sdb
/dev/sdb:
Timing buffered disk reads: 344 MB in 3.00 seconds = 114.48 MB/sec
dave@sm-xh97:~$
I dug this out of my PC notes, the 3 flavours of SATA(max speeds)
SATA1 or SATA/150 = 1,5Gbps or 150MB/s
SATA2 or SATA/300 = 3,0Gbps or 300MB/s
SATA3 or SATA/600 = 6,0Gbps or 600MB/s
I could use SATA1 for the HD, but for SSD it would be a bottleneck.
Remember they quote Gbps for SATA not MB/s
Upgrades WIP 2.6 to 2.8 - (6 X 2.6 to 2.8 completed on: 20/02/16 All O.K )
Linux Lite 3.0 Humming on a ASRock N3070 Mobo ~ btrfs RAID 10 Install on 4 Disks
Computers Early days:
ZX Spectrum(1982) , HP-150 MS-DOS(1983) , Amstrad CPC464(1984) , BBC Micro B+64(1985) , My First PC HP-Vectra(1987)
Posts: 28
Threads: 5
Joined: Jul 2015
Reputation:
0
Okay your conversion rates are off. 1.5G/s = 1,500M/s. Now some SSDs will be bottlenecked by sata1, but not many on the consumer side of things. Now if you start using raid or something then you might start to have some problems.
Sent from my XT1042 using Tapatalk
Posts: 1,255
Threads: 21
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
0
Meh, I go SSD when ever possible
Code:
harry@harry-Latitude-XT2:~$ sudo parted -l
[sudo] password for harry:
Model: ATA D2CSTK181M11-018 (scsi)
Disk /dev/sda: 180GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: msdos
Number Start End Size Type File system Flags
1 1049kB 9438MB 9437MB primary ext4 boot
2 9438MB 180GB 171GB primary ext4
FTW. It is only a touchscreen laptop. On a Desktop. I just go big and 7200 rpm.
I'm not one to overthink these things.
LL 3.6,2.8
Dell XT2 > Touchscreen Laptop
Dell 755 > Desktop
Acer 150 > Desktop
I am who I am. Your approval is not needed.
Posts: 1,484
Threads: 96
Joined: Mar 2014
Reputation:
0
@ Austin Payne
Those figure rounded for simplicity, but very close, Gbps to MB/s
It is very confusing... bits/sec vs Bytes/sec do some Googling Gbps to MB/s
Example
SATA 1.5Gb/s (aka SATA/150)
1,500 MHz embedded clock
x 1 bit per clock
x 80% for 8b10b encoding
/ 8 bits per byte
-----------------------------------
= 150 million Bytes per second
in other words:
150,000,000 Bytes per second
/ 1,024
----------------------------------
= 146,484.375 KiloBytes per second
=~ 146,484 KB/s
146,484.375 KiloBytes per second
/ 1,024
----------------------------------
= 143.0511474609375 MegaBytes per second
= 143 MB/s
Upgrades WIP 2.6 to 2.8 - (6 X 2.6 to 2.8 completed on: 20/02/16 All O.K )
Linux Lite 3.0 Humming on a ASRock N3070 Mobo ~ btrfs RAID 10 Install on 4 Disks
Computers Early days:
ZX Spectrum(1982) , HP-150 MS-DOS(1983) , Amstrad CPC464(1984) , BBC Micro B+64(1985) , My First PC HP-Vectra(1987)