Posts: 27
Threads: 19
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation:
0
I'm running LL 2.4 on an old Dell Dimension 4550 which really surprised me because I couldn't find anything other than Puppy Linux (which is un-usable) that would run on this old hardware. When I tried installing LL on newer hardware, it wouldn't install. Is it primarily designed for older systems?
Posts: 1,597
Threads: 85
Joined: Jun 2015
Reputation:
0
It is not just for older systems. If you look at the hardware database on the website, you'll see machines with some very modern specs.
I personally put LL 2.4 on a coworker's machine that was shipped with Windows 8. Almost felt wrong to do so...almost.
Want to thank me? Click my [Thank] link.
Posts: 508
Threads: 55
Joined: Jan 2015
Just installed LL 2.6 on a Dell desktop, this machine must be at least 12 years old .
It only has 1gig of ram and an old Pata HDD.
Running perfect.
Jocklad
Posts: 1,484
Threads: 96
Joined: Mar 2014
Reputation:
0
It glides along on a 12+ year old Celeron+1GB
It fly's/screams along on a Haswell i7-4790S, boots to stable desktop in 6/7 secs, non of this smoke and mirrors Windows fast boot
Upgrades WIP 2.6 to 2.8 - (6 X 2.6 to 2.8 completed on: 20/02/16 All O.K )
Linux Lite 3.0 Humming on a ASRock N3070 Mobo ~ btrfs RAID 10 Install on 4 Disks
Computers Early days:
ZX Spectrum(1982) , HP-150 MS-DOS(1983) , Amstrad CPC464(1984) , BBC Micro B+64(1985) , My First PC HP-Vectra(1987)
Posts: 37
Threads: 4
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation:
0
Working like a champ on my HP Pavilion zv6000us had some broadcom issues after install but other wise way faster than my xp was
Xpocalypse NOW I love smell of OS in the morning, Smells like 01110110011010010110001101110100011011110111001001111001
Linux user since January 14, 2014
I can look up things on the internet!