LINUX LITE 7.2 FINAL RELEASED - SEE RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS SECTION FOR DETAILS


Poll: Linux Lite Future Naming / Numbering Scheme?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Letters - Linux Lite Citrine A, B, C, etc. (misko_2083)
0%
0 0%
Roman Numerals - Linux Lite Citrine I, II, III, IV, etc. (misko_2083)
56.25%
9 56.25%
Numbers (In Words) - Linux Lite Citrine One, Two, etc. (misko_2083)
0%
0 0%
Binary - Linux Lite Citrine 1, 10, 11, 100, etc. (misko_2083)
0%
0 0%
Colors - Linux Lite Citrine White (.2), Red (.4), Blue (.6), etc. (sysdrum)
43.75%
7 43.75%
Current Number Scheme - No Change (Linux Lite Citrine 3.x)
0%
0 0%
Total 16 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Linux Lite Release Roadmap
#61
I think numbering versions makes it easier to web search than roman numerals.  Do you think you'd get better results from web searching Super Bowl 50, or Super Bowl L?
Want to thank me?  Click my [Thank] link.
Reply
#62
Please keep the number system. Much easier on us old dogs.

Robert
Reply
#63
Will the final version of 2.6 still be released on 1 Sep 15?  Will 2.4 update to the complete 2.6 or will we have to install 2.6 manually to get all it's features?  (I've got a new SSD.  No sense in installing 2.4 if I'll just have to wipe it and install 2.6 in a few weeks.)
Reply
#64
If I'm not mistaken.?
Once "Linux Lite 2.6 Final" is released, you can use the "Lite Upgrade" Tool to upgrade a 2.x to 2.6
Upgrades WIP 2.6 to 2.8 - (6 X 2.6 to 2.8 completed on: 20/02/16 All O.K )
Linux Lite 3.0 Humming on a ASRock N3070 Mobo ~ btrfs RAID 10 Install on 4 Disks Smile

Computers Early days:
ZX Spectrum(1982) , HP-150 MS-DOS(1983) , Amstrad CPC464(1984) ,  BBC Micro B+64(1985) , My First PC HP-Vectra(1987)
Reply
#65
(08-08-2015, 09:24 AM)Wirezfree link Wrote: If I'm not mistaken.?
Once "Linux Lite 2.6 Final" is released, you can use the "Lite Upgrade" Tool to upgrade a 2.x to 2.6

I read that too but I'm just making sure it's still valid.  It's enough of a pain to do a fresh install of an OS (not the install itself but migrating all of the passwords, bookmarks, settings, etc).  As long as 2.4 will upgrade to 2.6, it's worth it.  If not, I'll wait to install 2.6 on the new SSD when it comes out (hence the release date question).
Reply
#66
I'm sure if there are any issues Jerry would post...
So I think it's safe to assume Sept is still on the cards.
Upgrades WIP 2.6 to 2.8 - (6 X 2.6 to 2.8 completed on: 20/02/16 All O.K )
Linux Lite 3.0 Humming on a ASRock N3070 Mobo ~ btrfs RAID 10 Install on 4 Disks Smile

Computers Early days:
ZX Spectrum(1982) , HP-150 MS-DOS(1983) , Amstrad CPC464(1984) ,  BBC Micro B+64(1985) , My First PC HP-Vectra(1987)
Reply
#67
[Image: tumblr_inline_mq378y49Db1qz4rgp.gif]
Reply
#68
Smile Smile Smile
Upgrades WIP 2.6 to 2.8 - (6 X 2.6 to 2.8 completed on: 20/02/16 All O.K )
Linux Lite 3.0 Humming on a ASRock N3070 Mobo ~ btrfs RAID 10 Install on 4 Disks Smile

Computers Early days:
ZX Spectrum(1982) , HP-150 MS-DOS(1983) , Amstrad CPC464(1984) ,  BBC Micro B+64(1985) , My First PC HP-Vectra(1987)
Reply
#69
(08-09-2015, 07:22 PM)Wirezfree link Wrote:Smile Smile Smile

What he said.
Reply
#70
I actually like the numbering system.  I believe it's easier to keep track of.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)