LINUX LITE 7.2 FINAL RELEASED - SEE RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS SECTION FOR DETAILS


Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Updating Linux Lite Live USB not working
#11
Thanks Rogue Willie, and referring to Linux Lite as GNU/Linux Lite is a personal choice, certainly something we would not force on anyone Smile

See here - https://www.freecinema2022.gq/forums/intro...mentaries/ for an understanding of the history of linux and why some people use certain terminology when referring to free software and open source.
Reply
#12
Hello!

Yes, such nit-picking has driven countless multitudes away from many a Linux forum, and even away from (GNU/)Linux itself...

73 DE N4RPS
Rob
[Image: EtYqOrS.png%5D]

A gun in your hand is worth more than a whole police force on the phone.
Reply
#13
Not sure if by "nit-picking" you mean me... I wasn't hostile, and sorry if it looked like that. He said he's looking forward to learning more about Linux. So I wanted to point out some info. What I think is important info, for me atleast.

And of course it is a choice. Linux alone sounds better, but I believe it is important to call it GNU/Linux. Many people don't know what GNU is, yet they are using it every day... And they think Linus created the whole system...
Reply
#14
(06-07-2015, 02:43 AM)Zead link Wrote: Linux alone sounds better, but I believe it is important to call it GNU/Linux. Many people don't know what GNU is, yet they are using it every day... And they think Linus created the whole system...

You can only call something GNU/Linux if it is 100% GNU + the Linux Kernel. Anything else is misleading and inaccurate and totally ignores the efforts of people outside of the GNU project, and of course the whole point of this discussion is to label things correctly.
Reply
#15
(06-07-2015, 03:01 AM)Jerry link Wrote: [quote author=Zead link=topic=1945.msg14709#msg14709 date=1433645027]

Linux alone sounds better, but I believe it is important to call it GNU/Linux. Many people don't know what GNU is, yet they are using it every day... And they think Linus created the whole system...

You can only call something GNU/Linux if it is 100% GNU + the Linux Kernel. Anything else is misleading and inaccurate and totally ignores the efforts of people outside of the GNU project, and of course the whole point of this discussion is to label things correctly.
[/quote]
GNU/Linux Lite, or Linux Lite, as its official naming. Don't know why would it be incorrect. They are using modified GNU.
Or are you saying Richard Stallman, and the whole Free Software Foundation is wrong, and their work is a lie? Hm...

"Anything else is misleading and inaccurate and totally ignores the efforts of people outside of the GNU project." And calling it only Linux doesn't ignore the efforts of the GNU project people? I never said Linux Lite should be called GNU/Linux only. I was talking about adding GNU. Of course it's your official name. So you can call it whatever you want. I never said the "Lite" shouldn't be there.

And what is 100% GNU + Linux for you anyway?

It's like when Linus said, that it's OK to call it Linux, as long as the credit is given to everyone, yet he totally ignores the GNU... And he's against calling it GNU/Linux... Funny guy he is.

Debian GNU/Linux
Ubuntu GNU/Linux
OpenSuse GNU/Linux
GNU/Linux Lite
Trisquel GNU/Linux
etc...

Even Debian and Trisquel calls it GNU/Linux. The same as your GNU/Linux is named "Linux Lite". Even Ubuntu in documentations somewhere I think, and others... You don't have to use GNU to it. I take the name "Linux Lite" the same way as "Ubuntu" or "Debian", or "Fedora". It was just a suggestion to add GNU, since your distro name contains the word Linux. I don't know why it wouldn't be giving any credit to everyone... And I don't get what you mean by 100% GNU+Linux. 100% free?
Reply
#16
Let's keep this discussion respectful, throwing around inflammatory accusations like "Or are you saying Richard Stallman, and the whole Free Software Foundation is wrong, and their work is a lie? Hm..." does not progress the discussion.

I'll let my previous post stand for itself.
Reply
#17
It is my personal belief that GNU requires too much from the distributions that carry the name GNU/Linux when you limit what can be added to a distro, as in no use of proprietary drivers even though open source drivers are not available you are limiting the freedom of the user not encouraging it. One of the main goals of this distro is to make it easy for users to migrate from the windows environment. Forcing the requirements of GNU on the distro would undermine the ability to achieve that goal. 
“I have not failed. I’ve just found 10,000 ways that won’t work.” - Thomas Edison
Reply
#18
Well, I am one who thinks the thread title should be changed from "Frustration abounds"

To something more helpful and realistic like

"Updating linux lite live usb  not working" or something else pertinent to the issue that google will help incoming users look for when trying to solve their own issues. I just hate sloppy titles that have little to do with the problem at hand. Especially negative titles that are usually PBKAU related. Like these.



Not trying to being negative or critical of the OP. It just seems common sense and good manners to me. Being from the South.
A distro team member. A mod on a Linux forum specific to the distro team I am on.

But I am just a user here.  So just a personal opinion and nothing more.
LL 3.6,2.8
Dell XT2 > Touchscreen Laptop
Dell 755 > Desktop
Acer 150 > Desktop
I am who I am. Your approval is not needed.
Reply
#19
Good idea rokytnji Smile
Reply
#20
At this point in time GNU/BSD/LINUX/Android/Hurd who cares. As long as the code base works: Use it. Make it. Break it. Open it. Source it. Share it. Care about it. But don't bicker about the the name the context the reason the person the place or the thing.
For the world needs the source the source does not need the world.
I like my spoon it bends when I sing jingle bells.

Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)