(06-07-2015, 03:01 AM)Jerry link Wrote: [quote author=Zead link=topic=1945.msg14709#msg14709 date=1433645027]
Linux alone sounds better, but I believe it is important to call it GNU/Linux. Many people don't know what GNU is, yet they are using it every day... And they think Linus created the whole system...
You can only call something GNU/Linux if it is 100% GNU + the Linux Kernel. Anything else is misleading and inaccurate and totally ignores the efforts of people outside of the GNU project, and of course the whole point of this discussion is to label things correctly.
[/quote]
GNU/Linux Lite, or Linux Lite, as its official naming. Don't know why would it be incorrect. They are using modified GNU.
Or are you saying Richard Stallman, and the whole Free Software Foundation is wrong, and their work is a lie? Hm...
"Anything else is misleading and inaccurate and totally ignores the efforts of people outside of the GNU project." And calling it only Linux doesn't ignore the efforts of the GNU project people? I never said Linux Lite should be called GNU/Linux only. I was talking about adding GNU. Of course it's your official name. So you can call it whatever you want. I never said the "Lite" shouldn't be there.
And what is 100% GNU + Linux for you anyway?
It's like when Linus said, that it's OK to call it Linux, as long as the credit is given to everyone, yet he totally ignores the GNU... And he's against calling it GNU/Linux... Funny guy he is.
Debian GNU/Linux
Ubuntu GNU/Linux
OpenSuse GNU/Linux
GNU/Linux Lite
Trisquel GNU/Linux
etc...
Even Debian and Trisquel calls it GNU/Linux. The same as your GNU/Linux is named "Linux Lite". Even Ubuntu in documentations somewhere I think, and others... You don't have to use GNU to it. I take the name "Linux Lite" the same way as "Ubuntu" or "Debian", or "Fedora". It was just a suggestion to add GNU, since your distro name contains the word Linux. I don't know why it wouldn't be giving any credit to everyone... And I don't get what you mean by 100% GNU+Linux. 100% free?