LINUX LITE 7.2 FINAL RELEASED - SEE RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS SECTION FOR DETAILS


Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Linux Lite 3.2 Final Released
#31
Hi guys, thank you very much for another great release.

I couldn't find any mention of the upstream issues with AMD/ATI and the 16.04 LTS... Does this version of LL still have those?

Thanks very much!
"...But don't forget the songs that made you cry
And the songs that saved your life
Yes, you're older now
And you're a clever swine
But they were the only ones who ever stood by you"
Reply
#32
ATTENTION ALL WHO UPGRADED:

There was a bug in Lite Upgrade. This is now fixed. Please run:

Menu, Favorites, Install Updates
Menu, Settings, Lite Upgrade


I know this is pain for some to run this again, but if I don't fix this properly now, we will have this bug every upgrade.
Reply
#33
(11-03-2016, 12:50 PM)Jerry link Wrote: ... There was a bug in Lite Upgrade. ...

That answers my question I was about to ask because I did it before reading this. No problem, just had to set the LL widget to autostart and reposition it with Conky manager.
[Image: EtYqOrS.png%5D]

Left Mac OS X for Linux in Jan 2014
Reply
#34
(11-03-2016, 10:12 AM)Hans link Wrote: ... I couldn't find any mention of the upstream issues with AMD/ATI and the 16.04 LTS... Does this version of LL still have those?

I have never had any problems but I am using ADM Radeon HD (integrated).
[Image: EtYqOrS.png%5D]

Left Mac OS X for Linux in Jan 2014
Reply
#35
(11-03-2016, 12:50 PM)Jerry link Wrote: ATTENTION ALL WHO UPGRADED:

There was a bug in Lite Upgrade. This is now fixed. Please run:

Menu, Favorites, Install Updates
Menu, Settings, Lite Upgrade


I know this is pain for some to run this again, but if I don't fix this properly now, we will have this bug every upgrade.

Thanks for the info. Just did the update and upgrade without a problem.
Life on earth is expensive but it does include a free trip around the sun.
Reply
#36
All done thanks Jerry  Smile
Reply
#37
(11-03-2016, 02:21 PM)Coastie link Wrote: [quote author=Hans link=topic=3562.msg27125#msg27125 date=1478167957]
... I couldn't find any mention of the upstream issues with AMD/ATI and the 16.04 LTS... Does this version of LL still have those?

I have never had any problems but I am using ADM Radeon HD (integrated).
[/quote]

Thank you very much for your answer!!
Yeah, I'm going to try it regardless of the AMD CPU.
I'm so glad I'm back to LL!
Cheers!
"...But don't forget the songs that made you cry
And the songs that saved your life
Yes, you're older now
And you're a clever swine
But they were the only ones who ever stood by you"
Reply
#38
Quote:Canonical will not be supporting the fglrx/Catalyst Linux driver in their archive beginning with Ubuntu 16.04 Xenial Xerus. There's nothing stopping anyone from downloading the latest release from AMD.com and installing the driver directly or generating the Debian packages from that -- assuming upstream Linux kernel and xorg-server compatibility -- but it's not being supported by upstream Ubuntu.

For most users, the open-source Radeon graphics stack is "good enough" particularly if you just care about desktop use-cases, video playback, and light gaming. However, currently the open-source Radeon Linux graphics stack only supports OpenGL 4.1 rather than OpenGL 4.5, the open-source OpenCL compute stack leaves a lot to be desired, and there are other current open-source AMD driver limitations that for some users will make switching to the open-source driver a regression in experience and performance.

For those who like to risk breaking their system - http://tutorialforlinux.com/2016/06/01/h...enial-lts/
Reply
#39
Well, I understood "For most users, the open-source Radeon graphics stack is "good enough" particularly if you just care about desktop use-cases, video playback, and light gaming." I am clueless about that open stack stuff.  :Smile

Hopefully, that will not be a problem using Linux Lite.
[Image: EtYqOrS.png%5D]

Left Mac OS X for Linux in Jan 2014
Reply
#40
As the Spanish say..."no problemo"
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)