Posts: 191
Threads: 25
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation:
0
Ok so all done?
What were the results then?
LL 6.6 Dell Power Edge T310 Quad core 32g
LL 6.6 Acer E5-722-49HD A4-7210 Quad core
LL 6.6 Acer AX3812-E9502 intel Quad core
LL 6.2 Dell Optiplex 755 intel Core 2 duo
LL 3.8 Acer Aspire 3000 AMD processor
Simple, Fast, Efficient, Free, and Beats Windows all to hell.
Posts: 191
Threads: 25
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation:
0
Excellent. Where can I get a copy of that ISO? Please? Thanks.
LL 6.6 Dell Power Edge T310 Quad core 32g
LL 6.6 Acer E5-722-49HD A4-7210 Quad core
LL 6.6 Acer AX3812-E9502 intel Quad core
LL 6.2 Dell Optiplex 755 intel Core 2 duo
LL 3.8 Acer Aspire 3000 AMD processor
Simple, Fast, Efficient, Free, and Beats Windows all to hell.
Posts: 8,898
Threads: 542
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation:
5
The testing has finished. As I'm undecided still on UEFI support, I won't be making the iso public. If I did, I've have to give support on an undecided matter.
Posts: 228
Threads: 15
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation:
0
UEFI Is a very touchy subject. It would be wise to pospone the boot method. However, LL will have to eventually conform to booting to UEFI with no modifications to the boot options for non tech people. One way around everything is to offer a 64-bit UEFI enabled iso and a regular 64-bit iso, but that will create more confusion for new users.
Typed & Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Note 3 [SM-N900T] using the Tapatalk Android app.
Theodore,
HP Pavilion TouchSmart 11-e015dx (11-inch "Travelbook")
ASUS Republic Of Gamers G752VT-DH74 (17-inch Main) [6GB Nvidia GeForce GTX 970M GPU, 24GB RAM]
Posts: 893
Threads: 197
Joined: Jul 2014
Reputation:
0
If LL were to have integrated UEFI support, whose going to pay Microsoft for the license, given that no payment is involved (at present) for the use of LL?
64bit OS (32-bit on
Samsung[i] netbook) installed in [i]Legacy mode on MBR-formatted SSDs (except
pi which uses a micro SDHC card):
2017 -
Raspberry pi 3B (4cores) ~
[email protected] -
LibreElec, used for upgrading our Samsung TV (excellent for the task)
2012 -
Lenovo G580 2689 (2cores; 4threads] ~
[email protected] -
LL3.8/Win8.1 dual-boot (LL working smoothly)
2011 -
Samsung NP-N145 Plus (1core; 2threads) ~ Intel Atom
[email protected] -
LL 3.8 32-bit (64-bit too 'laggy')
2008 -
Asus X71Q (2cores) ~ Intel
[email protected] -
LL4.6/Win8.1 dual-boot, LL works fine with kernel 4.15
2007 -
Dell Latitude D630 (2cores) ~ Intel
[email protected] -
LL4.6, works well with kernel 4.4; 4.15 doesn't work
Posts: 530
Threads: 26
Joined: Feb 2015
Reputation:
0
04-06-2016, 01:25 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-06-2016, 01:55 PM by avj.)
I don't believe it is necessary to pay microsoft for anything, as there are techniques to build the necessary certificates.
http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/take...t?page=0,0
http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/take...t?page=0,1
“I have not failed. I’ve just found 10,000 ways that won’t work.” - Thomas Edison
Posts: 1,849
Threads: 21
Joined: Sep 2015
Reputation:
0
I can certainly give it a try; I happen to still be running the UEFI 2.8 version on the Kangaroo... 8)
LL4.8 UEFI 64 bit ASUS E402W - AMD E2 (Quad) 1.5Ghz - 4GB - AMD Mullins Radeon R2
LL5.8 UEFI 64 bit Test UEFI Kangaroo (Mobile Desktop) - Atom X5-Z8500 1.44Ghz - 2GB - Intel HD Graphics
LL4.8 64 bit HP 6005- AMD Phenom II X2 - 8GB - AMD/ATI RS880 (HD4200)
LL3.8 32 bit Dell Inspiron Mini - Atom N270 1.6Ghz - 1GB - Intel Mobile 945GSE Express -- Shelved
BACK LL5.8 64 bit Dell Optiplex 160 (Thin) - Atom 230 1.6Ghz - 4GB-SiS 771/671 PCIE VGA - Print Server
Running Linux Lite since LL2.2