11-02-2014, 08:33 PM
Hi,
I have been re-reading some of the comments, and also taking a step back.
Thinking out loud, my thought's....
If LL is aimed at new users & XP migrants then maybe a simple message on the LL Website
Along the lines of...
================================================
New Users it is "recommended" to start with LL 2.0,
that is going to be supported till 2019, and may suffice your needs.
Once you are comfortable, then the option will exist to move on to a new 2.X
The 2.X's updates can then provide "new features" if you want/require them.
================================================
If new users go straight to a 2.X release it may be off putting/challenging
if they are presented with choice/options they did not see on a "Live Boot"..??
Change can be difficult, but change after change even harder.
Regarding 2.X it'self,
There is a lot of great input, I guess taking a practical/pragmatic view
What can the Dev's deliver that won't detract them from adding LL features vs
the effort required to create special post install routines & choices that are only
used once during install..??
A browser choice is a good & logical thing to do, but keep it simple.
Just my thoughts...
Dave
I have been re-reading some of the comments, and also taking a step back.
Thinking out loud, my thought's....
If LL is aimed at new users & XP migrants then maybe a simple message on the LL Website
Along the lines of...
================================================
New Users it is "recommended" to start with LL 2.0,
that is going to be supported till 2019, and may suffice your needs.
Once you are comfortable, then the option will exist to move on to a new 2.X
The 2.X's updates can then provide "new features" if you want/require them.
================================================
If new users go straight to a 2.X release it may be off putting/challenging
if they are presented with choice/options they did not see on a "Live Boot"..??
Change can be difficult, but change after change even harder.
Regarding 2.X it'self,
There is a lot of great input, I guess taking a practical/pragmatic view
What can the Dev's deliver that won't detract them from adding LL features vs
the effort required to create special post install routines & choices that are only
used once during install..??
A browser choice is a good & logical thing to do, but keep it simple.
Just my thoughts...
Dave
Upgrades WIP 2.6 to 2.8 - (6 X 2.6 to 2.8 completed on: 20/02/16 All O.K )
Linux Lite 3.0 Humming on a ASRock N3070 Mobo ~ btrfs RAID 10 Install on 4 Disks
Computers Early days:
ZX Spectrum(1982) , HP-150 MS-DOS(1983) , Amstrad CPC464(1984) , BBC Micro B+64(1985) , My First PC HP-Vectra(1987)
Linux Lite 3.0 Humming on a ASRock N3070 Mobo ~ btrfs RAID 10 Install on 4 Disks
Computers Early days:
ZX Spectrum(1982) , HP-150 MS-DOS(1983) , Amstrad CPC464(1984) , BBC Micro B+64(1985) , My First PC HP-Vectra(1987)