10-21-2014, 01:22 AM
I tend to agree with rokytnji -- 32-bit probably better on that machine.
It's my understanding that a 64-bit OS will use slightly more RAM in operation than a 32-bit OS. Since you've only got 1GB of RAM on the machine, a 32-bit OS may very well make a noticeable difference in performance. The more RAM you have on the system the less likely you'll notice any difference. What I normally do is put 32-bit on anything with 2-3GB or less of RAM and 64-bit on any machine with 3-4GB or more. No "set in stone" rule on this though. You can install either version. (A 64-bit capable CPU can run either type of OS.)
It's my understanding that a 64-bit OS will use slightly more RAM in operation than a 32-bit OS. Since you've only got 1GB of RAM on the machine, a 32-bit OS may very well make a noticeable difference in performance. The more RAM you have on the system the less likely you'll notice any difference. What I normally do is put 32-bit on anything with 2-3GB or less of RAM and 64-bit on any machine with 3-4GB or more. No "set in stone" rule on this though. You can install either version. (A 64-bit capable CPU can run either type of OS.)
Try Linux Beginner Search Engine for answers to Linux questions.