[member=458]m654321[/member], quite true, they do it for profit, otherwise, why would they even bother, particularly to unfold so much as to become a synonym for online activity of the time, for example, google it, right?
I think that unless you do something really creepy, you are perfectly fine even going monitored, while it is quite silly to believe anyone would actually give a damn about monitoring anyone in particular, save maybe for targeting people who have gone famous for what they do or some enterprise, but it is a different story. If the system bothers you with the feedback, disable the personalized feedback or minimize the amount of data being stored about you, by going incognito mode, clearing up the historybanks and so on. It is even good to do once in a while, just for the hygiene. But said, what majority of people obsessed with privacy are doing, is that they create a statistical coverup for those really needing it, lest get caught. Like, if there were just a few people rioting in an otherwise peaceful public manifest, these few would get recognized and picked out very easily, but since there is an entire crowd rioting to a certain degree, it is harder to spot out those trespassing the border between manifesting and simply acting criminal. Mind that criminals very rarely are being idealistic. They share the mindset with the corporate world, which is, they are for profit or personal reward of a kind. Anyway, do you really believe anything is foolproof secure? You want to be secure over the Internet, plug out the Internet in your machine. I do understand some people are being strong privacy idealists for the sake of ideal, but what I think is that there is no sudden switch between quantity and quality of information, which means, even if some databank has gathered a lot of information about you, it changes nothing in the fact there is very little sensible use to that or such this much information has any more meaning than just a little information, when put to good use.
I think that unless you do something really creepy, you are perfectly fine even going monitored, while it is quite silly to believe anyone would actually give a damn about monitoring anyone in particular, save maybe for targeting people who have gone famous for what they do or some enterprise, but it is a different story. If the system bothers you with the feedback, disable the personalized feedback or minimize the amount of data being stored about you, by going incognito mode, clearing up the historybanks and so on. It is even good to do once in a while, just for the hygiene. But said, what majority of people obsessed with privacy are doing, is that they create a statistical coverup for those really needing it, lest get caught. Like, if there were just a few people rioting in an otherwise peaceful public manifest, these few would get recognized and picked out very easily, but since there is an entire crowd rioting to a certain degree, it is harder to spot out those trespassing the border between manifesting and simply acting criminal. Mind that criminals very rarely are being idealistic. They share the mindset with the corporate world, which is, they are for profit or personal reward of a kind. Anyway, do you really believe anything is foolproof secure? You want to be secure over the Internet, plug out the Internet in your machine. I do understand some people are being strong privacy idealists for the sake of ideal, but what I think is that there is no sudden switch between quantity and quality of information, which means, even if some databank has gathered a lot of information about you, it changes nothing in the fact there is very little sensible use to that or such this much information has any more meaning than just a little information, when put to good use.