LINUX LITE 7.2 FINAL RELEASED - SEE RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS SECTION FOR DETAILS


Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Are they false ?
#8
chkrootkit - No warning reported.

rkhunter --check 
"System checks summary
=====================

File properties checks...
    Files checked: 150
    Suspect files: 1

Rootkit checks...
    Rootkits checked : 365
    Possible rootkits: 0

Applications checks...
    All checks skipped

The system checks took: 1 minute and 56 seconds

All results have been written to the log file: /var/log/rkhunter.log

One or more warnings have been found while checking the system.
Please check the log file (/var/log/rkhunter.log)

  /usr/bin/whoami                                          [ OK ]
    /usr/bin/gawk                                            [ OK ]
    /usr/bin/lwp-request                                    [ Warning ]
    /usr/bin/s-nail                                          [ OK ]
    /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-size                          [ OK ]
    /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-strings                        [ OK ]



  Performing filesystem checks
    Checking /dev for suspicious file types                  [ Warning ]
    Checking for hidden files and directories                [ Warning ]

Folder for chkrootkit  was blank
2006 - HP DC7700p ultraslim Desktop Intel 6300 cpu  4GB Ram LL3.8 64bit.
2007 - Fujitsu Siemens V3405 Laptop  2 GB Ram LL3.6 32bit. Now 32bit Debian 9 + nonfree.
2006 - Fujitsu Siemens Si1520 Laptop Intel T720 cpu 3GB Ram   LL5.6 64 Bit
2014 - Fujitsu Siemens Lifebook E754 Intel i7 4712MQ 16GB Ram LL6.6
2003 - RETIRED Toshiba Satellite Pro A10 1 GB RAM LL2.8 32bit
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Are they false ? - by bitsnpcs - 11-09-2017, 03:30 PM
Re: Are they false ? - by rokytnji - 11-09-2017, 05:46 PM
Re: Are they false ? - by bitsnpcs - 11-09-2017, 08:08 PM
Re: Are they false ? - by newtusmaximus - 11-11-2017, 02:09 PM
Re: Are they false ? - by trinidad - 11-11-2017, 02:17 PM
Re: Are they false ? - by bitsnpcs - 11-11-2017, 03:19 PM
Re: Are they false ? - by newtusmaximus - 11-11-2017, 03:29 PM
Re: Are they false ? - by newtusmaximus - 11-11-2017, 03:54 PM
Re: Are they false ? - by trinidad - 11-11-2017, 04:14 PM
Re: Are they false ? - by newtusmaximus - 11-11-2017, 04:35 PM
Re: Are they false ? - by bitsnpcs - 11-11-2017, 06:34 PM
Re: Are they false ? - by trinidad - 11-11-2017, 08:00 PM
Re: Are they false ? - by trinidad - 11-11-2017, 08:38 PM
Re: Are they false ? - by Vera - 11-11-2017, 09:00 PM
Re: Are they false ? - by trinidad - 11-11-2017, 09:26 PM
Re: Are they false ? - by bitsnpcs - 11-11-2017, 11:47 PM
Re: Are they false ? - by rokytnji - 11-12-2017, 04:44 AM
Re: Are they false ? - by ian_r_h - 11-12-2017, 09:21 AM
Re: Are they false ? - by trinidad - 11-12-2017, 03:24 PM
Re: Are they false ? - by newtusmaximus - 11-12-2017, 11:43 PM
Re: Are they false ? - by bitsnpcs - 11-14-2017, 08:54 PM
Re: Are they false ? - by Valtam - 11-15-2017, 02:41 AM
Re: Are they false ? - by bitsnpcs - 11-15-2017, 04:52 AM
Re: Are they false ? - by trinidad - 11-15-2017, 12:47 PM
Re: Are they false ? - by bitsnpcs - 11-15-2017, 02:12 PM
Re: Are they false ? - by bitsnpcs - 11-15-2017, 10:20 PM
Re: Are they false ? - by bitsnpcs - 11-16-2017, 12:23 AM
Re: Are they false ? - by JmaCWQ - 11-16-2017, 04:23 AM
Re: Are they false ? - by bitsnpcs - 11-16-2017, 07:32 PM
Re: Are they false ? - by bitsnpcs - 11-16-2017, 08:35 PM
Re: Are they false ? - by trinidad - 11-16-2017, 09:16 PM
Re: Are they false ? - by TheDead - 11-16-2017, 09:53 PM
Re: Are they false ? - by bitsnpcs - 11-16-2017, 10:22 PM
Re: Are they false ? - by JmaCWQ - 11-17-2017, 06:26 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 16 Guest(s)