LINUX LITE 7.2 FINAL RELEASED - SEE RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS SECTION FOR DETAILS


Poll: What System Restore tool would you like to see included in Linux Lite?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Systemback
89.47%
17 89.47%
Timeshift
10.53%
2 10.53%
Total 19 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Restore Linux Lite - Systemback or Timeshift?
#34
[member=2]Jerry[/member]
[member=5916]trinidad[/member]

Thankyou both for your replies - yes user-friendliness has to be a priority.
Indeed a great shame that Systemback's days are numbered - does the job perfectly & is s-o-o-o simple to use - I loved it.  The next question is how long can one keep using Systemback safely for?

Jerry - I suspected you had very good reasons for choosing Timeshift, as you are always very methodical and thorough in your approach, paying attention to relevant detail & cutting out the superfluous !
 
Grsync: I did actually attempt to use it, but without a clear easy-to-follow manual, soon gave up... >Sad
64bit OS (32-bit on Samsung[i] netbook) installed in [i]Legacy mode on MBR-formatted SSDs (except pi which uses a micro SDHC card):
2017 - Raspberry pi 3B (4cores) ~ [email protected] - LibreElec, used for upgrading our Samsung TV (excellent for the task)  
2012 - Lenovo G580 2689 (2cores; 4threads] ~ [email protected] - LL3.8/Win8.1 dual-boot (LL working smoothly)
2011 - Samsung NP-N145 Plus (1core; 2threads) ~ Intel Atom [email protected] - LL 3.8 32-bit (64-bit too 'laggy')
2008 - Asus X71Q (2cores) ~ Intel [email protected] - LL4.6/Win8.1 dual-boot, LL works fine with kernel 4.15
2007 - Dell Latitude D630 (2cores) ~ Intel [email protected] - LL4.6, works well with kernel 4.4; 4.15 doesn't work
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Restore Linux Lite - Systemback or Timeshift? - by m654321 - 10-06-2017, 07:52 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)