09-17-2017, 11:27 PM
Unless it is picked up by someone else then yes, it would be irresponsible to include it in Series 4.x
Sent from my Mobile phone using Tapatalk
Sent from my Mobile phone using Tapatalk
LINUX LITE 7.2 FINAL RELEASED - SEE RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS SECTION FOR DETAILS
|
An alternative to systemback?
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
![[Image: X5qGkCg.png]](http://imgur.com/X5qGkCg.png)
![[Image: 0op1GNe.png]](http://i.imgur.com/0op1GNe.png)
![[Image: LgJ2mtP.png]](http://i.imgur.com/LgJ2mtP.png)
![[Image: vLZcFUE.png]](https://imgur.com/vLZcFUE.png)
![[Image: lrUHro3.jpg]](http://i.imgur.com/lrUHro3.jpg)
| Messages In This Thread |
|
An alternative to systemback? - by bfb - 09-17-2017, 05:53 PM
Re: An alternative to systemback? - by Valtam - 09-17-2017, 11:27 PM
Re: An alternative to systemback? - by bfb - 09-18-2017, 04:35 AM
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)