LINUX LITE 7.2 FINAL RELEASED - SEE RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS SECTION FOR DETAILS


Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
SURVEY: What's your experience of LL installed in UEFI mode - good, bad or ugly?
#17
Quote:My Dell 3135 netbook upgrade/install went smoothly

Thanks for your reply Rob  Smile
So, from what you said above, LL3.0 (with UEFI) installed without a hitch on the Dell 3135?
Does this mean for you that the terminal accepted the use of --force for the following lines where you're 'shimming'...
Code:
apt-get purge -y --force-yes grub* shim-signed linux signed*
and
Code:
apt-get install -y --force-yes grub-efi-amd-signed shim-signed linux-signed-generic

As I mentioned previously, when the install of LL3.0 (with UEFI) was attempted on my Asus G750, the terminal said  --force was deprecated in 16.04. It suggested using --allow, but I couldn't get it to work. Maybe I'm doing something wrong. Sad

Mike
64bit OS (32-bit on Samsung[i] netbook) installed in [i]Legacy mode on MBR-formatted SSDs (except pi which uses a micro SDHC card):
2017 - Raspberry pi 3B (4cores) ~ [email protected] - LibreElec, used for upgrading our Samsung TV (excellent for the task)  
2012 - Lenovo G580 2689 (2cores; 4threads] ~ [email protected] - LL3.8/Win8.1 dual-boot (LL working smoothly)
2011 - Samsung NP-N145 Plus (1core; 2threads) ~ Intel Atom [email protected] - LL 3.8 32-bit (64-bit too 'laggy')
2008 - Asus X71Q (2cores) ~ Intel [email protected] - LL4.6/Win8.1 dual-boot, LL works fine with kernel 4.15
2007 - Dell Latitude D630 (2cores) ~ Intel [email protected] - LL4.6, works well with kernel 4.4; 4.15 doesn't work
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: SURVEY: What's your experience of LL installed in UEFI mode - good, bad or ugly? - by m654321 - 07-05-2016, 06:03 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)