LINUX LITE 7.2 FINAL RELEASED - SEE RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS SECTION FOR DETAILS


Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
SURVEY: What's your experience of LL installed in UEFI mode - good, bad or ugly?
#8
Thanks, but all this can be found in the tutorial I posted previously at https://www.freecinema2022.gq/forums/tutor...y-enabled/

The point of my thread here is to find out how many installed LL in UEFI (using this tutorial) and whether it worked well for them.  I am particularly interested in experiences with LL3.0, either as a single boot or dual-boot set-up with a Windows OS.  My experience is that it works well for any LL2 series/Windows 7 OS or 7+,  but I was unable to get it to work for a LL3/Windows OS set-up due to deprecation of the --force command...  I am no expert in Linux command-line or in Linux more generally, by any measure, hence I was unable to sort out this problem by myself... do any of the experts in the forum have any clues to offer on this?

Regards
Mike
64bit OS (32-bit on Samsung[i] netbook) installed in [i]Legacy mode on MBR-formatted SSDs (except pi which uses a micro SDHC card):
2017 - Raspberry pi 3B (4cores) ~ [email protected] - LibreElec, used for upgrading our Samsung TV (excellent for the task)  
2012 - Lenovo G580 2689 (2cores; 4threads] ~ [email protected] - LL3.8/Win8.1 dual-boot (LL working smoothly)
2011 - Samsung NP-N145 Plus (1core; 2threads) ~ Intel Atom [email protected] - LL 3.8 32-bit (64-bit too 'laggy')
2008 - Asus X71Q (2cores) ~ Intel [email protected] - LL4.6/Win8.1 dual-boot, LL works fine with kernel 4.15
2007 - Dell Latitude D630 (2cores) ~ Intel [email protected] - LL4.6, works well with kernel 4.4; 4.15 doesn't work
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: SURVEY: What's your experience of LL installed in UEFI mode - good, bad or ugly? - by m654321 - 06-25-2016, 04:59 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)