LINUX LITE 7.2 FINAL RELEASED - SEE RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS SECTION FOR DETAILS


Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
QUESTION: Kernel and LTS relationship
#1
  A LTS is supported for 5 years from issue.    After that date the  user  is in freefall if he/she doesn't upgrade to next LTS?  However if user stays with an older LTS but keeps upgrading Kernel, does this extend the life if the original LTS.

The reverse scenario – Take for instance LL3.0 – if user down grades the Kernel to say 3.13 for hardware compatibility reasons, After 2019 ( when the LTS for LL2.8 expires; Kernel 3.13 being the standard for LL 2. 8) does the system  become vulnerable, assuming all updates are maintained??

I.e what is the relationship between Kernel and LTS re longevity/security./vulnerability. ??

Objective to keep older machines working (safely/ non vulnerable) for as long as possible.

PS , not sure where the emoji came from; can't seem to get rid of it. 
2006 - HP DC7700p ultraslim Desktop Intel 6300 cpu  4GB Ram LL3.8 64bit.
2007 - Fujitsu Siemens V3405 Laptop  2 GB Ram LL3.6 32bit. Now 32bit Debian 9 + nonfree.
2006 - Fujitsu Siemens Si1520 Laptop Intel T720 cpu 3GB Ram   LL5.6 64 Bit
2014 - Fujitsu Siemens Lifebook E754 Intel i7 4712MQ 16GB Ram LL6.6
2003 - RETIRED Toshiba Satellite Pro A10 1 GB RAM LL2.8 32bit
Reply


Messages In This Thread
QUESTION: Kernel and LTS relationship - by newtusmaximus - 06-01-2016, 11:38 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)