LINUX LITE 7.2 FINAL RELEASED - SEE RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS SECTION FOR DETAILS


Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Is Linux Lite 1.0.0 too old?
#9
My netbook has no problems running LL 2.8 as torreydale pointed out. Below are my specs if you would like to compare.

Code:
System:    Host: acer-AOA-150 Kernel: 3.13.0-24-generic i686 (32 bit, gcc: 4.8.2)
           Desktop: Xfce 4.11.8 (Gtk 2.24.23) Distro: Ubuntu 14.04 trusty
Machine:   System: Acer product: AOA150 version: 1
           Mobo: Acer model: N/A Bios: Acer version: v0.3310 date: 10/06/2008
CPU:       Single core Intel Atom CPU N270 (-HT-) cache: 512 KB flags: (nx pae sse sse2 sse3 ssse3) bmips: 3192.02
           Clock Speeds: 1: 1333.00 MHz 2: 1066.00 MHz
Graphics:  Card: Intel Mobile 945GSE Express Integrated Graphics Controller bus-ID: 00:02.0
           X.Org: 1.15.1 drivers: intel (unloaded: fbdev,vesa) Resolution: [email protected], [email protected]
           GLX Renderer: Mesa DRI Intel 945GME x86/MMX/SSE2 GLX Version: 1.4 Mesa 10.1.3 Direct Rendering: Yes
Audio:     Card: Intel NM10/ICH7 Family High Definition Audio Controller driver: snd_hda_intel bus-ID: 00:1b.0
           Sound: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture ver: k3.13.0-24-generic
Network:   Card-1: Realtek RTL8101/2/6E PCI Express Fast/Gigabit Ethernet controller
           driver: r8169 ver: 2.3LK-NAPI port: 3000 bus-ID: 02:00.0
           IF: eth0 state: down mac: <filter>
           Card-2: Qualcomm Atheros AR242x / AR542x Wireless Network Adapter (PCI-Express) driver: ath5k bus-ID: 03:00.0
           IF: wlan0 state: up mac: <filter>
Drives:    HDD Total Size: 410.1GB (2.6% used) 1: id: /dev/sda model: WDC_WD1600BEVT size: 160.0GB
           2: USB id: /dev/sdb model: FreeAgent_Go size: 250.1GB
Partition: ID: / size: 143G used: 9.8G (8%) fs: ext4 ID: swap-1 size: 4.09GB used: 0.00GB (0%) fs: swap
RAID:      No RAID devices detected - /proc/mdstat and md_mod kernel raid module present
Sensors:   System Temperatures: cpu: 55.0C mobo: N/A
           Fan Speeds (in rpm): cpu: N/A
Info:      Processes: 167 Uptime: 59 min Memory: 334.0/988.7MB Runlevel: 2 Gcc sys: 4.8.4
           Client: Shell (bash 4.3.11) inxi: 1.9.17
“I have not failed. I’ve just found 10,000 ways that won’t work.” - Thomas Edison
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Is Linux Lite 1.0.0 too old? - by Ottawagrant - 02-21-2016, 04:49 PM
Re: Is Linux Lite 1.0.0 too old? - by Ottawagrant - 02-21-2016, 05:46 PM
Re: Is Linux Lite 1.0.0 too old? - by rokytnji - 02-21-2016, 06:30 PM
Re: Is Linux Lite 1.0.0 too old? - by LinuxNoob - 02-21-2016, 08:27 PM
Re: Is Linux Lite 1.0.0 too old? - by justme2 - 02-21-2016, 09:01 PM
Re: Is Linux Lite 1.0.0 too old? - by rokytnji - 02-21-2016, 09:12 PM
Re: Is Linux Lite 1.0.0 too old? - by torreydale - 02-22-2016, 02:17 PM
Re: Is Linux Lite 1.0.0 too old? - by avj - 02-22-2016, 02:42 PM
Re: Is Linux Lite 1.0.0 too old? - by rokytnji - 02-23-2016, 03:34 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)