Posts: 227
Threads: 33
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
0
As long as there is a quick option to install Firefox, Chrome and Chromium (and maybe Opera?) in the initial start up options, it's all good. I think most would like to just check a box and install their choice of browsers. If they have to go online to install, it will take away from the simplicity.
Posts: 3,237
Threads: 125
Joined: Jul 2014
Reputation:
0
Is it possible a link from the browser choice that opens the "Install Additional Software" or an "Install Your browser" GUI ?
If it is a separate GUI things related to, or reliant upon, specific browsers such as Netflix and plugins could go below each browser on the list. Can horizontal rule/dividers be used in the GUI to separate things this way ?
It would also allow for additional browsers to be added at a future time to the list.
It could free up space on the Install Additional Software List, for other additional software options at a future time.
I certainly don't think that restricting size to a CD is important - the smaller systems such as Netbooks don't have optical readers anyway, so USB sticks are necessary for installation.
I agree with others that a fully-featured browser is important during the pre-installation, testing phase which most potential escapees from Windows will want, therefore it must be part of the release.
I use both Firefox and Chromium, and while only one is actually required to allow the potential user to experiment with Linux, since size is not a problem I would suggest both are shipped.
Incidentally, I also agree with an earlier suggestion that if size were a real problem, then an obvious candidate for removing from the release media would be LibreOffice, not a browser!
Posts: 83
Threads: 8
Joined: Mar 2014
Reputation:
0
So in LL 2.2 there will be first time bootup setup that will allow setup options?
Posts: 682
Threads: 98
Joined: Apr 2014
Reputation:
0
As a linux newbie, still acclimatising, might i pitch in.
Assuming that one of the main objectives of LL is to win over ex XP fraternity who by nature will have older hardware, a live CD is the most backwardly compatible option. Not all "old" computers have a USB boot up bios option.
The compatibility issue with their hardware, and peipherals, i.e. setup, is the main hurdle that newbies have to encounter - in a completely strange environment. Hence the kernel (linux drivers) is the key, and any other "tricks" that help maintain the OS from becoming bloated during use - i.e cleaner, etc.
There is a vast amount of older hardware, which would otherwise be scrapped, out there that can be given a second life and perform sufficently well for most "everyday" needs.
2006 - HP DC7700p ultraslim Desktop Intel 6300 cpu 4GB Ram LL3.8 64bit.
2007 - Fujitsu Siemens V3405 Laptop 2 GB Ram LL3.6 32bit. Now 32bit Debian 9 + nonfree.
2006 - Fujitsu Siemens Si1520 Laptop Intel T720 cpu 3GB Ram LL5.6 64 Bit
2014 - Fujitsu Siemens Lifebook E754 Intel i7 4712MQ 16GB Ram LL6.6
2003 - RETIRED Toshiba Satellite Pro A10 1 GB RAM LL2.8 32bit
Posts: 656
Threads: 106
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation:
0
As a new (regular) Linux user since January 2014 coming from Mac OS X and XP, I agree with the other comments that Firefox should be available on the live DVD.* I would want my test drive of any distro to include using Firefox on the internet. A choice of uninstalling or installing browsers could be offered during or after install.
* Still don't get this live CD option. Linux Lite 1.0.6, 1.0.8, and 2.0 never fit on a CD for me. They alway were on DVD's.
Left Mac OS X for Linux in Jan 2014
I have no problem graduating up to DVD size. Lite Browser sounds like a good idea to cover the Help Manual.
I personally use Firefox. Having said that I could care less which browser comes with a distro. Easy enough to remove one and install another. There are always at least a couple of apps I either remove or install. It just isn't a big deal. I really like your browser configure app. Looking good so far. 8)