LINUX LITE 7.2 FINAL RELEASED - SEE RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS SECTION FOR DETAILS


Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Defrag
#11
A couple things -
Lag and Slowness are a bit general - are you having the same lag hovering over icons?
You're using LL3.0 Ubuntu base is 16.04; 14.04 fixes may or may not resolve exactly...

For the hardware you shouldn't notice any slowness in general...
If the slowness is similar to the icons as with the link provided - it maybe graphics related (updating driver) but I'm going to take a stab and say the slowness you're experiencing is related to internet browsing/connectivity??? Again this is my guess as I see its a Broadcom  Wink

I'm curious to what's slow for you..
Pinpointing exactly will yield different drivers to update/support.

Also before updating drivers; I would suggest making a Systemback backup, if updating drivers have an ill effect it will be easy to revert back.

Some info on Broadcom - https://www.freecinema2022.gq/forums/netwo...7/#msg4997
But searching will result a lot of results.. Again if the slowness is network related  :o

I was posting the same time as Jerry... Or as he suggests....
LL4.8 UEFI 64 bit ASUS E402W - AMD E2 (Quad) 1.5Ghz  - 4GB - AMD Mullins Radeon R2
LL5.8 UEFI 64 bit Test UEFI Kangaroo (Mobile Desktop) - Atom X5-Z8500 1.44Ghz - 2GB - Intel HD Graphics
LL4.8 64 bit HP 6005- AMD Phenom II X2 - 8GB - AMD/ATI RS880 (HD4200)
LL3.8 32 bit Dell Inspiron Mini - Atom N270 1.6Ghz - 1GB - Intel Mobile 945GSE Express  -- Shelved
BACK LL5.8 64 bit Dell Optiplex 160 (Thin) - Atom 230 1.6Ghz - 4GB-SiS 771/671 PCIE VGA - Print Server
Running Linux Lite since LL2.2
Reply
#12
I concur with Jerry.
I think that HD is a significant source of performance issues...
Benchmark for Hitachi HT54505

I think any recent SSD is going to be a major boost.

You are only using 3.7% of 500GB, so even a cheap 120/128GB would be enough
Upgrades WIP 2.6 to 2.8 - (6 X 2.6 to 2.8 completed on: 20/02/16 All O.K )
Linux Lite 3.0 Humming on a ASRock N3070 Mobo ~ btrfs RAID 10 Install on 4 Disks Smile

Computers Early days:
ZX Spectrum(1982) , HP-150 MS-DOS(1983) , Amstrad CPC464(1984) ,  BBC Micro B+64(1985) , My First PC HP-Vectra(1987)
Reply
#13
@firenice03 raises some good points

Are you seeing laggy internet..??
What does a speed test give you.?

With that CPU you should not have issues really
Benchmark for: AMD A6-3420M

On my N3700 I get to the desktop from cold boot in @ 10~12secs with a SSD


I think your disk is a bottleneck



Upgrades WIP 2.6 to 2.8 - (6 X 2.6 to 2.8 completed on: 20/02/16 All O.K )
Linux Lite 3.0 Humming on a ASRock N3070 Mobo ~ btrfs RAID 10 Install on 4 Disks Smile

Computers Early days:
ZX Spectrum(1982) , HP-150 MS-DOS(1983) , Amstrad CPC464(1984) ,  BBC Micro B+64(1985) , My First PC HP-Vectra(1987)
Reply
#14
Just to check on the HD as likely culprit, go to Disks, press CTRL+S, and look over your SMART Data.
Curiosity kills the cat.
Terry Davis Command Line video cracks me up.
Quod delere vos ego faciam permanens.
Reply
#15
You can also do a quick test on the disk:

Use whatever your sdx is, a, b, c

For comparison,
On a good WD Hard Disk
Code:
sudo hdparm -t /dev/sdb
/dev/sdb:
Timing buffered disk reads: 332 MB in  3.00 seconds = 110.57 MB/sec

On Samsung SSD
Code:
sudo hdparm -t /dev/sda
/dev/sda:
Timing buffered disk reads: 1494 MB in  3.00 seconds = 497.68 MB/sec



Upgrades WIP 2.6 to 2.8 - (6 X 2.6 to 2.8 completed on: 20/02/16 All O.K )
Linux Lite 3.0 Humming on a ASRock N3070 Mobo ~ btrfs RAID 10 Install on 4 Disks Smile

Computers Early days:
ZX Spectrum(1982) , HP-150 MS-DOS(1983) , Amstrad CPC464(1984) ,  BBC Micro B+64(1985) , My First PC HP-Vectra(1987)
Reply
#16
(09-06-2016, 07:30 PM)Wirezfree link Wrote: You can also do a quick test on the disk:

Use whatever your sdx is, a, b, c

For comparison,
On a good WD Hard Disk
Code:
sudo hdparm -t /dev/sdb
/dev/sdb:
Timing buffered disk reads: 332 MB in  3.00 seconds = 110.57 MB/sec

On Samsung SSD
Code:
sudo hdparm -t /dev/sda
/dev/sda:
Timing buffered disk reads: 1494 MB in  3.00 seconds = 497.68 MB/sec
This is what I got:

Timing buffered disk reads: 244 MB in  3.01 seconds =  81.03 MB/sec


Reply
#17
Disks:

[Image: Screenshot_2016_09_08_21_40_10.png]

[Image: Screenshot_2016_09_08_21_41_00.png]
Reply
#18
It's O.K, but 5 to 6X slower than an SSD
Upgrades WIP 2.6 to 2.8 - (6 X 2.6 to 2.8 completed on: 20/02/16 All O.K )
Linux Lite 3.0 Humming on a ASRock N3070 Mobo ~ btrfs RAID 10 Install on 4 Disks Smile

Computers Early days:
ZX Spectrum(1982) , HP-150 MS-DOS(1983) , Amstrad CPC464(1984) ,  BBC Micro B+64(1985) , My First PC HP-Vectra(1987)
Reply
#19
(09-08-2016, 01:45 PM)Wirezfree link Wrote: It's O.K, but 5 to 6X slower than an SSD

I've installed a virtual machine do you think it's possible to run it with this specs? I'm planning to install windows in it.
Reply
#20
(09-06-2016, 04:51 PM)firenice03 link Wrote: A couple things -
Lag and Slowness are a bit general - are you having the same lag hovering over icons?
You're using LL3.0 Ubuntu base is 16.04; 14.04 fixes may or may not resolve exactly...

For the hardware you shouldn't notice any slowness in general...
If the slowness is similar to the icons as with the link provided - it maybe graphics related (updating driver) but I'm going to take a stab and say the slowness you're experiencing is related to internet browsing/connectivity??? Again this is my guess as I see its a Broadcom  Wink

I'm curious to what's slow for you..
Pinpointing exactly will yield different drivers to update/support.

Also before updating drivers; I would suggest making a Systemback backup, if updating drivers have an ill effect it will be easy to revert back.

Some info on Broadcom - https://www.freecinema2022.gq/forums/netwo...7/#msg4997
But searching will result a lot of results.. Again if the slowness is network related  :o

I was posting the same time as Jerry... Or as he suggests....

Hmm.. I wish I can explain it more accurately. It's not slow like a speed of a car, it's more laggy for example minimizing a browser it tends to leave some kind of trail some sort of a shadow.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)