Posts: 9
Threads: 1
Joined: Dec 2016
Reputation:
0
Just voted for Linux Lite but I specified the version LL 2.8 because I have this distro for almost a year now and I couldn't find any fault to this day. I have LL 3.2 that I just installed on a different desktop a week ago and I still cannot find solution for my Epson L210 scanner to work, so LL3.2 is on an evaluation phase for me. Sad to know that Linux Lite is just one of the OTHERS.
Posts: 1,849
Threads: 21
Joined: Sep 2015
Reputation:
0
Voted 8) 8)
Wish we could see all the "others" listed ;D ;D ;D
LL4.8 UEFI 64 bit ASUS E402W - AMD E2 (Quad) 1.5Ghz - 4GB - AMD Mullins Radeon R2
LL5.8 UEFI 64 bit Test UEFI Kangaroo (Mobile Desktop) - Atom X5-Z8500 1.44Ghz - 2GB - Intel HD Graphics
LL4.8 64 bit HP 6005- AMD Phenom II X2 - 8GB - AMD/ATI RS880 (HD4200)
LL3.8 32 bit Dell Inspiron Mini - Atom N270 1.6Ghz - 1GB - Intel Mobile 945GSE Express -- Shelved
BACK LL5.8 64 bit Dell Optiplex 160 (Thin) - Atom 230 1.6Ghz - 4GB-SiS 771/671 PCIE VGA - Print Server
Running Linux Lite since LL2.2