LINUX LITE 7.2 FINAL RELEASED - SEE RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS SECTION FOR DETAILS


Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
cut down linux lite 64 bit?
#1
some years ago Jerry gave some terminal instructions so that Linux lite could be run in a very basic mode.. It was a development thought / experiment.  Have tried to find it on archive , without success.  Would like to test that approach for LL 4.4 64 bit if possible.  Laptop basic use  Fuji Si1520 3 GB RAM .  Thanks
2006 - HP DC7700p ultraslim Desktop Intel 6300 cpu  4GB Ram LL3.8 64bit.
2007 - Fujitsu Siemens V3405 Laptop  2 GB Ram LL3.6 32bit. Now 32bit Debian 9 + nonfree.
2006 - Fujitsu Siemens Si1520 Laptop Intel T720 cpu 3GB Ram   LL5.6 64 Bit
2014 - Fujitsu Siemens Lifebook E754 Intel i7 4712MQ 16GB Ram LL6.6
2003 - RETIRED Toshiba Satellite Pro A10 1 GB RAM LL2.8 32bit
Reply
#2
Maybe "Linux Liter?"  Oh, make that "Linux Lighter" or "Linux Helium" for computers with low RAM, like Chromebooks and stuff.
Reply
#3
(08-26-2019, 08:59 AM)Artim link Wrote: Maybe "Linux Liter?"  Oh, make that "Linux Lighter" or "Linux Helium" for computers with low RAM, like Chromebooks and stuff.
I suppose we talk about an install option?

Linux Helium, absolutely fantastic, but that would already mean another distro, which is not the case.

Linux Liter [not to mistake with 'a lighter'?] associates in my mind too much with a saying: "make things simple, but not simpler", which ridicules it, therefore, I am against.

I recognize Jerry has long been fighting for the brandname of Linux Lite to become recognizable and it must be capitalized upon - sort of - especially that GNU/Linux world in given regard is a very competitive place.

Therefore, it should have something with Linux Lite in it, without removing the emphasis.

Eventually, just keep it mainline Linux Lite, but think about gradually moving with the content amount more towards the minimum-end spectrum of things, albeit on the other hand, the distro cannot be empty.
Reply
#4
(08-26-2019, 09:54 AM)MS link Wrote: Linux Liter

1 Liter = 1000 millilitres. Even more confusing  ;D
I'll eat my hat if Jerry approves of a second 'Lite' distro, or a derivative thereof - don't say I didn't warn you !!!
64bit OS (32-bit on Samsung[i] netbook) installed in [i]Legacy mode on MBR-formatted SSDs (except pi which uses a micro SDHC card):
2017 - Raspberry pi 3B (4cores) ~ [email protected] - LibreElec, used for upgrading our Samsung TV (excellent for the task)  
2012 - Lenovo G580 2689 (2cores; 4threads] ~ [email protected] - LL3.8/Win8.1 dual-boot (LL working smoothly)
2011 - Samsung NP-N145 Plus (1core; 2threads) ~ Intel Atom [email protected] - LL 3.8 32-bit (64-bit too 'laggy')
2008 - Asus X71Q (2cores) ~ Intel [email protected] - LL4.6/Win8.1 dual-boot, LL works fine with kernel 4.15
2007 - Dell Latitude D630 (2cores) ~ Intel [email protected] - LL4.6, works well with kernel 4.4; 4.15 doesn't work
Reply
#5
(08-26-2019, 10:16 AM)m654321 link Wrote: [quote author=MS link=topic=6664.msg48465#msg48465 date=1566813264]
Linux Liter

1 Liter = 1000 millilitres. Even more confusing  ;D
I'll eat my hat if Jerry approves of a second 'Lite' distro, or a derivative thereof - don't say I didn't warn you !!!
[/quote]
Nonetheless the idea of having a "minimum" install option - or an install option allowing to choose the web browser coming by default, from among at least three to choose from - could come in handy.
Reply
#6
(08-26-2019, 10:25 AM)MS link Wrote: Nonetheless the idea of having a "minimum" install option - or an install option allowing to choose the web browser coming by default, from among at least three to choose from - could come in handy.

First, LL is already pretty minimal (hence the name 'Lite'), coming with none of the bloat of many other distros.

Second, the target audience for LL, are those migrating from Windows OS who, in the main, are not familiar or comfortable with Linux. Consequenctly,  Jerry & the Team have made great efforts to provide cross-platform apps in the LL package that will, in general, be familiar to migrating Windows users. If one starts cutting these out, leaving the building of the distro to a new user's choice, especially if they're not 'techy', it wont help and is likely to be counterproductive.

Third, Jerry has already said previously that he & the team don't have the time or energy to have a second version (e.g. Arm version for Raspberry pi)  or provide LL with a variety of desktop versions, etc. They are, afterall, a team of volunteers with a life outside LL. This issue of another version has come up more than once in the last five years I've been here, though he does encourage anyone who wants to develop a new offshoot (as you're suggesting) to have a go. Sorry, I don't wish to dampen your enthusiasm, just provide a few explanations ...
64bit OS (32-bit on Samsung[i] netbook) installed in [i]Legacy mode on MBR-formatted SSDs (except pi which uses a micro SDHC card):
2017 - Raspberry pi 3B (4cores) ~ [email protected] - LibreElec, used for upgrading our Samsung TV (excellent for the task)  
2012 - Lenovo G580 2689 (2cores; 4threads] ~ [email protected] - LL3.8/Win8.1 dual-boot (LL working smoothly)
2011 - Samsung NP-N145 Plus (1core; 2threads) ~ Intel Atom [email protected] - LL 3.8 32-bit (64-bit too 'laggy')
2008 - Asus X71Q (2cores) ~ Intel [email protected] - LL4.6/Win8.1 dual-boot, LL works fine with kernel 4.15
2007 - Dell Latitude D630 (2cores) ~ Intel [email protected] - LL4.6, works well with kernel 4.4; 4.15 doesn't work
Reply
#7
I simply give some suggestions to consider. "Custom" install and "default" install are not that hard to get, but I do understand it takes energy and time to implement, without necessarily doing all this much difference.
Reply
#8
This was  circa 5 or so lines of sudo instructions in sequence that cut what was running in the background to a minimum.  It was a post install option so I suppose could be a tweaks if readopted.  Will have to try and dig out the original post - some years ago so some delay before I get back.  It was not  major change
Found The original post  Super Lite Mode for Lite Tweaks  « on: June 11, 2017, 06:15:11 AM »  Going to give it a try on the Fuji Si1520 LL4.4  and see what happens
2006 - HP DC7700p ultraslim Desktop Intel 6300 cpu  4GB Ram LL3.8 64bit.
2007 - Fujitsu Siemens V3405 Laptop  2 GB Ram LL3.6 32bit. Now 32bit Debian 9 + nonfree.
2006 - Fujitsu Siemens Si1520 Laptop Intel T720 cpu 3GB Ram   LL5.6 64 Bit
2014 - Fujitsu Siemens Lifebook E754 Intel i7 4712MQ 16GB Ram LL6.6
2003 - RETIRED Toshiba Satellite Pro A10 1 GB RAM LL2.8 32bit
Reply
#9
Interesting. Something like a "turbo" button for RAM. What I would rather be interested in, though, is keeping a komputer in a prolonged state of optimum performance, rather than going from one surge to another. But I do understand what is the point, it is to quickly get rid of all the bloat going around.
Reply
#10
I still like the idea. Let's see if I can get it into 4.8 Smile
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)