Firstly, the terminal command is actually sudo fdisk -l in my previous post. Sorry for missing the sudo part out.
Secondly, both my other LL laptops (my alternate and my test unit), still running kernel 4.4.0-generic 98 without serious issues, report the same under sudo fdisk -l. This suggests the configuration was set up at installation ("build time").
This means that anyone (especially a fellow newbie) who follows the prompts from the 64-bit LL 3.6 live-DVD during installation, but checks "encrypt entire hard disk" (and the wipe disk) option may get the same configuration as I have.
Using the terminal commands suggested at
https://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/linux-chec...e-command/
I get the following:-
Code:
ian@linux02:~$ cat /proc/swaps
Filename Type Size Used Priority
/dev/dm-2 partition 4108284 0 -1
ian@linux02:~$ swapon -s
Filename Type Size Used Priority
/dev/dm-2 partition 4108284 0 -1
ian@linux02:~$ free -g
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 3 0 2 0 0 2
Swap: 3 0 3
ian@linux02:~$ free -k
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 3960120 1026068 2187332 127540 746720 2555424
Swap: 4108284 0 4108284
ian@linux02:~$ free -m
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 3867 1002 2135 124 729 2495
Swap: 4011 0 4011
ian@linux02:~$ vmstat
procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system-- ------cpu-----
r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa st
0 0 0 2186944 32080 714664 0 0 51 8 85 300 4 1 94 1 0
ian@linux02:~$ vmstat 1 5
procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system-- ------cpu-----
r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa st
0 0 0 2187068 32088 714992 0 0 50 8 85 300 4 1 94 1 0
0 0 0 2185952 32088 716096 0 0 0 0 355 982 3 2 95 0 0
0 0 0 2186324 32088 716096 0 0 0 0 407 1303 2 4 93 0 0
0 0 0 2186200 32096 716096 0 0 0 12 314 950 2 2 96 1 0
0 0 0 2186324 32096 716096 0 0 0 0 327 1000 3 1 96 0 0
However, one of these three units (I am not sure which), has shown swap being used when I was running task manager previously; complete with noticeable disk activity. This suggests that at some point in ..98, ..101 and/or ..102 kernels swap had been working. Also, I have tended to use very large, scripted spreadsheets in a project in recent past in LibreOffice, without any issues.
Again, I hope this helps.
It looks to me like swap is (or had been) working, even if it is not configured as expected(?) Though I am certainly concerned by the red error message under sudo fdisk -l in my previous post (which is present on all three machines).
Is there any safe way to test the swap file operation? I.e., to run a test use of the swap space, which will not cause any harm but will report the success or failure of the use of the swap space?