Error while installing updates 3.0 - bobw - 06-16-2016
I have just installed LL3.0 but cannot install updates. I have tried 2 separate repositories. The system is as installed - I haven't installed any other software. The error message that I am getting in the terminal or Synaptic suggests that the fault lies with LL:
"The repository 'http://repo.linuxlite.com/linuxlite xenial Release' does not have a Release file.Data from such a repository can't be authenticated and is therefore potentially dangerous to use."
Re: Error while installing updates 3.0 - Valtam - 06-16-2016
Please paste your /etc/apt/sources.list
Re: Error while installing updates 3.0 - bobw - 06-16-2016
Hi Jerry. Sources.list attached as text file.
Re: Error while installing updates 3.0 - technomancer - 06-26-2016
I have installed LL 3.0 and have an update error as well.
Code: apt-get update
[sudo] password for technomancer:
Hit:1 http://repo.steampowered.com/steam precise InRelease
Hit:2 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial InRelease
Hit:3 http://repo.linuxliteos.com/linuxlite citrine InRelease
Hit:6 http://ppa.launchpad.net/nemh/systemback/ubuntu xenial InRelease
Hit:7 http://archive.canonical.com xenial InRelease
Hit:8 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-backports InRelease
Err:2 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial InRelease
The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 40976EAF437D05B5 NO_PUBKEY 3B4FE6ACC0B21F32
Get:4 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates InRelease [94.5 kB]
Get:5 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security InRelease [94.5 kB]
Hit:9 http://ppa.launchpad.net/otto-kesselgulasch/gimp/ubuntu xenial InRelease
Err:3 http://repo.linuxliteos.com/linuxlite citrine InRelease
The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 22AAEA0A86A02625
Hit:10 http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntu-wine/ppa/ubuntu xenial InRelease
Err:7 http://archive.canonical.com xenial InRelease
The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 40976EAF437D05B5 NO_PUBKEY 3B4FE6ACC0B21F32
Err:8 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-backports InRelease
The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 40976EAF437D05B5 NO_PUBKEY 3B4FE6ACC0B21F32
Err:4 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates InRelease
The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 40976EAF437D05B5 NO_PUBKEY 3B4FE6ACC0B21F32
Err:5 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security InRelease
The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 40976EAF437D05B5 NO_PUBKEY 3B4FE6ACC0B21F32
Fetched 189 kB in 1s (161 kB/s)
Reading package lists... Done
W: An error occurred during the signature verification. The repository is not updated and the previous index files will be used. GPG error: http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial InRelease: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 40976EAF437D05B5 NO_PUBKEY 3B4FE6ACC0B21F32
W: An error occurred during the signature verification. The repository is not updated and the previous index files will be used. GPG error: http://repo.linuxliteos.com/linuxlite citrine InRelease: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 22AAEA0A86A02625
W: An error occurred during the signature verification. The repository is not updated and the previous index files will be used. GPG error: http://archive.canonical.com xenial InRelease: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 40976EAF437D05B5 NO_PUBKEY 3B4FE6ACC0B21F32
W: An error occurred during the signature verification. The repository is not updated and the previous index files will be used. GPG error: http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-backports InRelease: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 40976EAF437D05B5 NO_PUBKEY 3B4FE6ACC0B21F32
W: An error occurred during the signature verification. The repository is not updated and the previous index files will be used. GPG error: http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates InRelease: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 40976EAF437D05B5 NO_PUBKEY 3B4FE6ACC0B21F32
W: An error occurred during the signature verification. The repository is not updated and the previous index files will be used. GPG error: http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security InRelease: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 40976EAF437D05B5 NO_PUBKEY 3B4FE6ACC0B21F32
W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial/InRelease The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 40976EAF437D05B5 NO_PUBKEY 3B4FE6ACC0B21F32
W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-updates/InRelease The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 40976EAF437D05B5 NO_PUBKEY 3B4FE6ACC0B21F32
W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-backports/InRelease The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 40976EAF437D05B5 NO_PUBKEY 3B4FE6ACC0B21F32
W: Failed to fetch http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-security/InRelease The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 40976EAF437D05B5 NO_PUBKEY 3B4FE6ACC0B21F32
W: Failed to fetch http://archive.canonical.com/dists/xenial/InRelease The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 40976EAF437D05B5 NO_PUBKEY 3B4FE6ACC0B21F32
W: Failed to fetch http://repo.linuxliteos.com/linuxlite/dists/citrine/InRelease The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 22AAEA0A86A02625
W: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead.
Here is my /etc/apt/sources.list file contents
Code: # deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial main restricted
# deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial-updates main restricted
# deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted
# See http://help.ubuntu.com/community/UpgradeNotes for how to upgrade to
# newer versions of the distribution.
deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial main restricted
# deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial main restricted
## Major bug fix updates produced after the final release of the
## distribution.
deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial-updates main restricted
# deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial-updates main restricted
## N.B. software from this repository is ENTIRELY UNSUPPORTED by the Ubuntu
## team, and may not be under a free licence. Please satisfy yourself as to
## your rights to use the software. Also, please note that software in
## universe WILL NOT receive any review or updates from the Ubuntu security
## team.
deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial universe
# deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial universe
deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial-updates universe
# deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial-updates universe
## N.B. software from this repository is ENTIRELY UNSUPPORTED by the Ubuntu
## team, and may not be under a free licence. Please satisfy yourself as to
## your rights to use the software. Also, please note that software in
## multiverse WILL NOT receive any review or updates from the Ubuntu
## security team.
deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial multiverse
# deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial multiverse
deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial-updates multiverse
# deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial-updates multiverse
## N.B. software from this repository may not have been tested as
## extensively as that contained in the main release, although it includes
## newer versions of some applications which may provide useful features.
## Also, please note that software in backports WILL NOT receive any review
## or updates from the Ubuntu security team.
deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial-backports main restricted universe multiverse
# deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial-backports main restricted universe multiverse
## Uncomment the following two lines to add software from Canonical's
## 'partner' repository.
## This software is not part of Ubuntu, but is offered by Canonical and the
## respective vendors as a service to Ubuntu users.
# deb http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu xenial partner
# deb-src http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu xenial partner
deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted
# deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted
deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security universe
# deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security universe
deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security multiverse
# deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security multiverse
deb http://archive.canonical.com/ xenial partner
# deb-src http://archive.canonical.com/ xenial partner
Here is the llupdates.log as well
Code: Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
Reading state information...
Calculating upgrade...
The following packages will be upgraded:
libmysqlclient20 libmysqlclient20:i386 linux-firmware lshw mysql-common
5 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 34.4 MB of archives.
After this operation, 1,092 kB of additional disk space will be used.
WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated!
lshw mysql-common libmysqlclient20:i386 libmysqlclient20 linux-firmware
E: There were unauthenticated packages and -y was used without --allow-unauthenticated
Also my theme and icons change to the following screen-shot after 10 seconds for some reason. Looks like a default ?
Re: Error while installing updates 3.0 - aus9 - 06-27-2016
I hope Jerry does not mind making some comments and suggestions?
open a terminal and convert to root by command sudo su
for me, after running apt-get update I see that I do not have the same issue as OP but am on a diff server list....showing above and below results to show no errors
Quote:Hit:10 http://archive.canonical.com xenial InRelease
Hit:11 http://repo.linuxliteos.com/linuxlite citrine InRelease
Hit:12 http://ppa.launchpad.net/nemh/systemback/ubuntu xenial InRelease
suggestion this is one way to fix the GPG errors for technomancer
copy and paste this into your root powered terminal and I show my result
Quote:#!/bin/sh
LIST="40976EAF437D05B5 3B4FE6ACC0B21F32 22AAEA0A86A02625 "
for Z in $LIST
do
gpg --recv-key $Z && gpg -a --export $Z | apt-key add -
done
Code: # my result
root@asus:/home/gordon# #!/bin/sh
root@asus:/home/gordon# LIST="40976EAF437D05B5 3B4FE6ACC0B21F32 22AAEA0A86A02625 "
root@asus:/home/gordon# for Z in $LIST
> do
> gpg --recv-key $Z && gpg -a --export $Z | apt-key add -
> done
gpg: requesting key 437D05B5 from hkp server keys.gnupg.net
gpg: key 437D05B5: public key "Ubuntu Archive Automatic Signing Key <[email protected]>" imported
gpg: no ultimately trusted keys found
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg: imported: 1
OK
gpg: requesting key C0B21F32 from hkp server keys.gnupg.net
gpg: key C0B21F32: public key "Ubuntu Archive Automatic Signing Key (2012) <[email protected]>" imported
gpg: no ultimately trusted keys found
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg: imported: 1 (RSA: 1)
OK
gpg: requesting key 86A02625 from hkp server keys.gnupg.net
gpg: key 86A02625: "Jerry Bezencon (Linux Lite) <[email protected]>" not changed
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg: unchanged: 1
OK
root@asus:/home/gordon#
thanks to technomancer......you then need to repeat the code and then
If you see 3 successful OKs then run as root command .......after doing the commands twice, run next command to finish the changes
and hopefully you have eliminated those gpg errors
###########################
Now back to OP
can you post the contents of /etc/apt/sources.list.d/linuxlite.list/linuxlite.lst
I show mine in case it helps on 3.0 64 bit
Quote:deb http://repo.linuxliteos.com/linuxlite/ citrine main
I wonder, and I am new to LL if there has been a mixup with an update from an earlier install of LL?
If Jerry says it OK, you could just update your file but Jerry may not like me....well who can blame him....heh heh
so another suggestion for OP is open a terminal and show the full output of
in the hope it might show more issues due to wrong sources
Re: Error while installing updates 3.0 - technomancer - 06-27-2016
This worked for me ! I had to run the command 2 times however for some reason it only gave 2 OK's, after second one it worked.
Thank You aus9
(06-27-2016, 12:27 AM)aus9 link Wrote: I hope Jerry does not mind making some comments and suggestions?
open a terminal and convert to root by command sudo su
for me, after running apt-get update I see that I do not have the same issue as OP but am on a diff server list....showing above and below results to show no errors
Quote:Hit:10 http://archive.canonical.com xenial InRelease
Hit:11 http://repo.linuxliteos.com/linuxlite citrine InRelease
Hit:12 http://ppa.launchpad.net/nemh/systemback/ubuntu xenial InRelease
suggestion this is one way to fix the GPG errors for technomancer
copy and paste this into your root powered terminal and I show my result
Quote:#!/bin/sh
LIST="40976EAF437D05B5 3B4FE6ACC0B21F32 22AAEA0A86A02625 "
for Z in $LIST
do
gpg --recv-key $Z && gpg -a --export $Z | apt-key add -
done
Code: # my result
root@asus:/home/gordon# #!/bin/sh
root@asus:/home/gordon# LIST="40976EAF437D05B5 3B4FE6ACC0B21F32 22AAEA0A86A02625 "
root@asus:/home/gordon# for Z in $LIST
> do
> gpg --recv-key $Z && gpg -a --export $Z | apt-key add -
> done
gpg: requesting key 437D05B5 from hkp server keys.gnupg.net
gpg: key 437D05B5: public key "Ubuntu Archive Automatic Signing Key <[email protected]>" imported
gpg: no ultimately trusted keys found
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg: imported: 1
OK
gpg: requesting key C0B21F32 from hkp server keys.gnupg.net
gpg: key C0B21F32: public key "Ubuntu Archive Automatic Signing Key (2012) <[email protected]>" imported
gpg: no ultimately trusted keys found
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg: imported: 1 (RSA: 1)
OK
gpg: requesting key 86A02625 from hkp server keys.gnupg.net
gpg: key 86A02625: "Jerry Bezencon (Linux Lite) <[email protected]>" not changed
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg: unchanged: 1
OK
root@asus:/home/gordon#
If you see 3 successful OKs then run as root command
and hopefully you have eliminated those gpg errors
Re: Error while installing updates 3.0 - aus9 - 06-27-2016
my mistake, I have editted my previous reply to show your fix. Thanks
I might add I did a copy and paste of a little script I made up and running as a copy and paste, you don't need to show a shebang #!/bin/sh
but if you saved the contents as a script you would have run a different command.
I am just waffling here to show Jerry I am only half a coder.
Re: Error while installing updates 3.0 - XpRefugee - 07-19-2016
I tried all the above still no satisfaction
Unchecked http://repo.linuxliteos.com/linuxlite xenial/
it worked
I noticed that the repository http://repo.linuxliteos.com/linuxlite xenial/ did not exist
So i changed it to http://repo.linuxliteos.com/linuxlite citrine
( I don't think this was a good Idea as currently my menus don't work.)
I am learning to work with linux so I am bound to jack stuff up in the process.
I am going to reboot the system after this post to see if all is well if not I will have to learn how to undo what I have done or reinstall 3.0
I have a separate /home so I really can t loose much other than system settings and some other packages that may need to be reinstalled.
Bill
Re: Error while installing updates 3.0 - LL-user - 08-17-2016
Hey Jerry,
May I ask what the official/ Devs' take is on this?
I run into this too while installing LL3.0 64-bit.
Thanks
Re: Error while installing updates 3.0 - Valtam - 08-17-2016
(08-17-2016, 02:40 AM)LL-user link Wrote: Hey Jerry,
May I ask what the official/ Devs' take is on this?
I run into this too while installing LL3.0 64-bit.
Thanks data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9d91/d9d91f230666501cf02bc83f50bda2e7247dac36" alt="Smile Smile"
It's not that easy to pin point. I've been using 64bit since we started supporting it and never ran across this issue.
|