+- Linux Lite Forums (https://www.freecinema2022.gq/forums)
+-- Forum: General (https://www.freecinema2022.gq/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Suggestions and Feedback (https://www.freecinema2022.gq/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=13)
+--- Thread: Restore Linux Lite - Systemback or Timeshift? (/showthread.php?tid=1946)
Re: Restore Linux Lite - Systemback or Timeshift? - m654321 - 10-06-2017
I'm too late to participate in the System Restore Tool poll, because I only noticed this post through recent discussion for Timeshift, though understand the reason Timeshift was presented as an alternative to Systemback (it 'mimics' Windows OS restore tool). It's a shame that the poll only presented one alternative to Systemback: what about other GUI-based System Restore Tools that could have been considered to give more of a choice, e.g. Grsync, Deja-dup (and others?)
Re: Restore Linux Lite - Systemback or Timeshift? - Valtam - 10-06-2017
There are very good reasons for this.
Grsync is way to complex for new users and doesn't have point and click restore points. Deja-dup is already provided by Linux Lite (Accessories > Backups).
Systemback and Timeshift do exactly what they are designed to do, very well. No other system restore software can hold a candle to them both. The similarity was so close, it was only fair that a Poll be presented to the community to let everyone here decide. Viva la freedom.
Re: Restore Linux Lite - Systemback or Timeshift? - trinidad - 10-06-2017
It's apples and apples for this stuff. Given the purpose of Linux Lite the more new user friendly the better. Timeshift or even smaller flyback is fine for this OS. It's a shame systemback will not be available as it is very nice for new users. I can't criticize either in depth as I use neither, only Borg myself, and even that not that often, but I can see a good purpose for new users. I would never recommend grsync for anything. Simpler to just tar stuff.
TC
Re: Restore Linux Lite - Systemback or Timeshift? - m654321 - 10-06-2017
[member=2]Jerry[/member]
[member=5916]trinidad[/member]
Thankyou both for your replies - yes user-friendliness has to be a priority.
Indeed a great shame that Systemback's days are numbered - does the job perfectly & is s-o-o-o simple to use - I loved it. The next question is how long can one keep using Systemback safely for?
Jerry - I suspected you had very good reasons for choosing Timeshift, as you are always very methodical and thorough in your approach, paying attention to relevant detail & cutting out the superfluous !
Grsync: I did actually attempt to use it, but without a clear easy-to-follow manual, soon gave up... >
Re: Restore Linux Lite - Systemback or Timeshift? - torreydale - 10-06-2017
[member=458]m654321[/member] ,
I use grsync. I learned how to use it via Joe Collins on YouTube. Here's a link to one of his videos on it. I use it for the reasons he lists. But I would still want an option for restore points.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nOojLe_CI0
Re: Restore Linux Lite - Systemback or Timeshift? - Artim - 10-07-2017
The "Make it an ISO" option that Systemback offers is not available in Timeshift. That's the only important difference. I think I would keep systemback (as a downloaded .deb) just to install it myself in LL 4.0 when the time comes, even though it'll be unsupported.
Re: Restore Linux Lite - Systemback or Timeshift? - m654321 - 10-07-2017
[member=2]Jerry[/member]
Like RandomBoy, I'm tempted to continuing using Systemback in LL4.x
But, what is the risk given that it will be unsupported, as asked in reply#33 ?
Given Linux's good stability and low risk to malware attack, and given sensible use (i.e. not visiting at-risk websites or links), isn't one fairly safe in continuing to use it ? I'm curious to know the answer to this one ...
Re: Restore Linux Lite - Systemback or Timeshift? - paul1149 - 10-07-2017
I was just reading of another possibility, Snapper, which is shipped with some distros. But for it to work with EXT4 takes a little preparation, so I went no further. I don't know how good the prog is, but assuming that the necessary preparation could be done once for all by the LL devs, it might be worth a look.
As far as Systemback and LL4, I believe it's not just a matter of support being lacking, the program actually is not compatible with the more recent kernal.
Re: Restore Linux Lite - Systemback or Timeshift? - m654321 - 10-07-2017
(10-07-2017, 11:31 AM)paul1149 link Wrote: I was just reading of another possibility, Snapper, which is shipped with some distros. But for it to work with EXT4 takes a little preparation, so I went no further. I don't know how good the prog is, but assuming that the necessary preparation could be done once for all by the LL devs, it might be worth a look.From which kernel version is Systemback incompatible with ?
As far as Systemback and LL4, I believe it's not just a matter of support being lacking, the program actually is not compatible with the more recent kernal.
It's an important question as I've noticed that LL, and Ubuntu generally, tends to be conservative with the kernel version used, i.e version 4, whereas some other distros are already on version 12 ...
Re: Restore Linux Lite - Systemback or Timeshift? - paul1149 - 10-07-2017
(10-07-2017, 12:02 PM)m654321 link Wrote: from which kernel version is it incompatible with ?I don't have the number at hand, but I think the incompatibility is immanent. LL lags a bit, so that might buy you some time.